On 5 Dec 2014 00:45, "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com> wrote:
> >> Should it maybe use `lexical-let'?
>
> AM> Maybe. Do you foresee it behaving unexpectedly in a file with dynamic
> AM> scope?
>
> If you want to support older Emacsen, it's probably better. But it's up
> to you, and I don't know exactly what your code does.

> >> I hope it can go into the core so it's available by default.
>
> AM> On the other hand, making it a package makes it a reliable dependency
> AM> available since 24.1
>
> To me, a package seems overkill for a single useful macro, but I haven't
> seen the source so perhaps there's more to it. There was no URL in your
> post and I don't see an assoc-let package in any of the ELPA repos I
> know.

Yes, when I sent that email I hadn't yet factored it out from the other
project where it was born.

I've attached the file now. There isn't much more to it, it's really quite
simple.


> Anyhow, it's your code, please publish it however you wish.

Of course, but all feedback is welcome.

I'll be pushing this once I've written a test or two for it.


Cheers