On 11 Dec 2014 17:29, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> > What naming scheme should we use? Either prefix the branch name with
> > something really obvious, like “dont-merge/BRANCH-NAME”, so that
> > people who unaware of this convention don't make that mistake. Or
> > prefix it with any of the usual words that denote in-development, such
> > as “dev/BRANCH-NAME”.
>
> I vote against `dont-merge', and propose `scratch' as another contender.

Oh, I like that!