From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clojure-like syntactic sugar for an anonymous function literal Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:48:59 -0200 Message-ID: References: <54C05269.7050602@dancol.org> <87oaprfa3t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877fwfunnz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <873872vq5v.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421938455 13116 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2015 14:54:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Oleh , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 22 15:54:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ9C-0000ua-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:54:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ9C-0007zY-3n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:54:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ49-0007fo-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ48-0002ez-DW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:49:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]:52554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEJ48-0002eq-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id vb8so1740036obc.10 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=esvsSAo0EMXNXaEj7iPnpyyoJ6oPvs5y4mHSDTXrsTY=; b=GcN4uPmxmrX7lAyAJl2emDJ3//hvlrbHK9K4YWCxHJOIgl+Wzx0qnHpNVX+sZOx34Q v5i4GwxyarP5d+hfNaWyeZiwH4iQPeG0FCaYkRFV0epvUxKy3HqKaMENVLtm8Yu1FCTP TnX0y4X6HOZ+RZpEBCawuZdo4j5l0Ht4RQSnaylQVdqWHVLGdOEYD4yyDgNixVMNdhnG fqoB8f+dmsew9C5In215spzRgHkxa7iA90Z4zvP7rO1Z4Grn/PV67jUreVP1LiPAiW7Q Cb4KqQ0KR/+5OSHyH+6zHt8HZ+leBCbQDmNFYa2RdYbry9bD24NlJUtD18H5ZD9gLxAZ MW3g== X-Received: by 10.60.136.170 with SMTP id qb10mr1120262oeb.71.1421938139292; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.76.125.1 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:48:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <873872vq5v.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Google-Sender-Auth: MZAwagX6CHlzIg3yESDHeVeOp18 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181609 Archived-At: > The proposed "short-lambda" is pure sugar and adds zero expressiveness > to the language. Furthermore, in Emacsen it would be subject to > substantial abuse (eg, in hooks where anonymous functions are a bad > idea). Are they more subject than a full lambda?