From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to inhibit message3 from Elisp? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:22:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87618psiu4.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8y1l3ho.fsf@gmail.com> <83618o4eom.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhhke5s1.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c387504c465e0514536767 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429723340 1916 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2015 17:22:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Oleh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:22:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkyLr-000554-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:22:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36325 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkyLq-00072y-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkyLm-00072i-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkyLl-000485-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]:35482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkyLk-00047b-BH; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so180321975lab.2; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MjasTaE6oOTEJTQuVrHOk3JTmH/Oigtqt8wQ5rT3VvQ=; b=Lupp58QZC8Y+ARfHA1avaF77/w9xSVmYfIsla4rsBLt6HLO7IkaBN0vtN+xg9gAcwK kua40MdZV+KFiJmrD8lyPAfBf6RuK2jTwIsrVCprXY3Kb/WfyJDdhTGhzvOVDm5fj9Ac 6MyJL4ZvLfNPiU/doqYNMBOjoeqttVpqxd3rn5WxviEpCsOyQVM56enkNhVKRZlJKxWx mRjo8kcJ14XdPAbhcQhtu1u1E9hvcr/8nHgQfL9OHbXTxERS4rCrK9shYVdLzmEZPSP8 uNZpc/VsgJPLyZj5TAxr0jhjjmyK4V56fqBFcM8AjTZLTQoteI4/PdrpKf/wBwp36kjR Me1Q== X-Received: by 10.112.200.230 with SMTP id jv6mr25679118lbc.21.1429723331444; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:22:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87lhhke5s1.fsf@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: YKKJoT4gkFS3U3RP85Z4CTCXlJc X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185785 Archived-At: --001a11c387504c465e0514536767 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Updated etc/NEWS and the manual (entry for `message'). > Let me know if it's OK to merge. Now that I think about it, the really ideal way to do this would be to have a with-no-messages macro/special form, so that stupid packages can't setq this variable permanently. But if that's too impractical, the current version is fine. --001a11c387504c465e0514536767 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

> Updated etc/NEWS and the manual (entry for `message').
> Let me know if it's OK to merge.

Now that I think about it, the really ideal way to do this would be to have a with-no-messages macro/special form, so that stupid packages can't setq this variable permanently.

But if that's too impractical, the current version is fine.

--001a11c387504c465e0514536767--