From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: subr-x on Elpa Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:33:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3db8214a1590516845177 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432132460 23655 80.91.229.3 (20 May 2015 14:34:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 14:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 20 16:34:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv54X-0005Gc-Uv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 16:34:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52230 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv54W-0001tm-Vk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59150) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv54H-0001tf-Hn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv54G-0001Fo-E8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]:35344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv54G-0001Ff-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so77453645lab.2 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ARcRzy7EU7Lhw6afQQBXw1X67/v/WI9YuGmNXCXxTSM=; b=WrnXLZHsiEUKxREyCpxt34vZji8+NA2Gcd5zT+KdwsACKezGN3mn9l+boeMd9AAiAG pr+pnmjAuyC2M9mdmZJadwuptxzGaOXfwQkxNelX5zBuOdMHCDvz5SyJMGF97dWcRubI +6LcVdZABDW+WpM2iJz8i7p+FrKYW9P6/QA7Exd3ZsFakGkly0OdozkTeBtsg22WQxeE qSSjvclxL9ulhUqVuom/D2loFI7j0CyPtaqeacehZD7gXaJzodynjcL7HHQ4PvuXzYow Cn1BGqrSSCsNAm//0T2fmIXWaj850YGgPg8Ch/V0uOvPJujw5pfDSQULQSonFQZb8G85 jbHg== X-Received: by 10.112.204.6 with SMTP id ku6mr8712020lbc.73.1432132435351; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 07:33:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: _KfYzhmu6R3ZXv4U-eU-uWsT_qU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186664 Archived-At: --001a11c3db8214a1590516845177 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > If I do that, would it be viable to offer subr-x on GNU Elpa as well? > > Like we do for seq.el? Yes, precisely. > I don't like this duplication very much, but as > long as they are 100% identical, I think it's OK. I'm never a fan of redundancy, but in this case I think it's worth the evil. But it would certainly be nice to have a way to link the source of an Elpa package to its built-in counterpart. --001a11c3db8214a1590516845177 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> > If I do that, would it be viable to offer subr-x o= n GNU Elpa as well?
>
> Like we do for seq.el?=C2=A0

Yes, precisely.

> I don't like this duplication very much, but as
> long as they are 100% identical, I think it's OK.

I'm never a fan of redundancy, but in this case I think = it's worth the evil.
But it would certainly be nice to have a way to link the source of an Elpa = package to its built-in counterpart.

--001a11c3db8214a1590516845177--