From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:59:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463396434 13873 80.91.229.3 (16 May 2016 11:00:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert , Dmitry Gutov , Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 13:00:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFw-00029F-SI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 13:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFw-00016p-E2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFs-00011v-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:00:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFn-0007Y8-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:00:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFn-0007Y1-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GFm-0007KA-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 07:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22440 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 22440-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22440.146339636328080 (code B ref 22440); Mon, 16 May 2016 11:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2016 10:59:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GF8-0007Iq-Rb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 06:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.213.51]:34459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b2GF6-0007Ib-Qd for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2016 06:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id c189so55212247vkb.1 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 03:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B9C8lsBe3Gx2qQxrJp7Ip/rtO6wlmg5y6Dzx8OGY1PQ=; b=fGLkg6cp9aOXVztKENey0poSB6jjxmrIB/ug5tpPBXkCYSmb1w8PUyUsw5bNMgx3pQ VAoKpPvDzFFrKmu5esiTciwYK2UNY5+emsXc5gRn9Lh7vi5IuVbyYXrSnp36tbyqtn0T ue/EKYkTU89F7y/RFOymG8RjuwRam8SnsSYingnXCc4tgRDJdxUo0VVrx4l3G7cb6b/U sJskCKv8MhkBNbNZVLoBpDTC9TpbuejBRpfCaBB/vQ2ARth1pl1F/kxot0G2OTaLOzoz QsdUtqCfKPoFaUyW0a3oZUvJsh5J7uTcuHi357Ql9MSJWyiBtd1WSL6qSDlHOQMdXDD0 Ym8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B9C8lsBe3Gx2qQxrJp7Ip/rtO6wlmg5y6Dzx8OGY1PQ=; b=IeayZlz8zd3hunlgdrPRGl05rcfY0rJxxZSz3ymI8C+8KxPYCjdOxwlpUIXzF6dCxt oZwXruvbPd9roJeRzCstiDlnMHhyHbLJVqKkwumUv+536hyekVLBgwiJ1BdoisEANF6k fQA8APgu7+SJbh4cWrd6WoD7Xzgzt6/8D79ctC3oI9PP7gYlPvz0/xzgCgsVZ4CqJBMU Gl5bGgYiJUkkgy9pzlCHDHrIYbN39vLU5uTjfTmy5MhmyzokaosGNgaue/Hz2z5XA16X AQocmebjcLIkUoUhYmV7nQo12rzt+bMF+MnwSj6p8h0relqLLaiz7QjYMU4eNHx3vFwb lYYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW1vEDhGhgasFrpNvYKnkh1xdV4R00L7adbPORZPfV67s5MqMMaqpLmoh0mg2YVOzIK0/0Ipf1DLsLdRA== X-Received: by 10.31.181.83 with SMTP id e80mr12947322vkf.26.1463396355213; Mon, 16 May 2016 03:59:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118279 Archived-At: --001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'll look into it tonight. Thanks for ccing me. On Sun, 15 May 2016 1:50 pm Paul Eggert, wrote: > Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > >> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when > installing, and do > >> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happening, > right? > > > > Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed? > > Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether that > particular > package is signed. I know little about packages and am just trying to get > this > blocking bug fixed. > > It would be helpful if someone could look into this who knows about > packages. > I'll CC: this to Artur, who I hope fills the bill. Artur, could you please > look > at Bug#22440, or let us know who we should ask about this? Thanks. > --001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'll look into it tonight.
Thanks for ccing me.


On Sun, 15 May 2016 1:50 pm= Paul Eggert, <eggert@cs.ucla.edu<= /a>> wrote:
Dmitry Gutov wrote:<= br> > On 05/15/2016 10:03 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
>> package-check-signature t means check package signatures when inst= alling, and do
>> not install a package if it is unsigned. Which is what is happenin= g, right?
>
> Aren't packages coming from GNU ELPA supposed to all be signed?
Sorry, I don't know. I don't even know how to determine whether tha= t particular
package is signed. I know little about packages and am just trying to get t= his
blocking bug fixed.

It would be helpful if someone could look into this who knows about package= s.
I'll CC: this to Artur, who I hope fills the bill. Artur, could you ple= ase look
at Bug#22440, or let us know who we should ask about this? Thanks.
--001a1143a68ceb119e0532f38380--