From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ASCII-folded search [was: Re: Upcoming loss of usability ...] Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:49:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20150615142237.GA3517@acm.fritz.box> <87y4jkhqh5.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <557F3C22.4060909@cs.ucla.edu> <5580D356.4050708@cs.ucla.edu> <87si9qonxb.fsf@gnu.org> <87ioamz8if.fsf@petton.fr> <32013464-2300-46c6-ba46-4a3c36bfee5d@default> <87twu62nnt.fsf@mbork.pl> <87oakdfwim.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83wpz1lh7c.fsf@gnu.org> <83oakdl7yj.fsf@gnu.org> <83ioall3x5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1435006193 17828 80.91.229.3 (22 Jun 2015 20:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Turnbull , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 22 22:49:47 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z78f1-0000RZ-Nu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:49:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z78f1-0001tT-7j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z78ex-0001tL-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:49:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z78ex-0005Kw-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:49:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]:36660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z78eu-0005K1-LA; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: by lacny3 with SMTP id ny3so117362937lac.3; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HUKDrOSOYToXnxVUIlhhRzHiIkny7IA7MS+qgA2ovcs=; b=vqoc/qx3jCGqm6AsJrAGx3YOrF3lxUZetH4ohAmTNI2WfgypxerrALEF95nNH/6KmJ J2Rm3/+fjW+jKaSe6oQgTjr4jNocNoKvN9GOY9GphPca81Ytss3yaDlop1LXh9+kgWjC RWvjFQ31hs7UpHxslYLTcQFsdQFsfbG/X2C5+I0LIdjCgaL1TV0laVMxAjll7rxOC3Wk 1tF9nGOyzowJtp7B8eQupNlOxC7UR3UdRSY7fspMx6tfbIEu3l/8AyfPQ4NY9o0La+7E Cq68+ZuC/vJVfQmIuYzJofi+hPp+DdS9AFoTG4RUR5T0CatbNjRPExAyFAeI+f9N7pVF wQDA== X-Received: by 10.112.210.137 with SMTP id mu9mr30847503lbc.95.1435006175833; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.214.133 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ioall3x5.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: eLKYbts4NIpZIDOI5NUbosQomiQ X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187394 Archived-At: 2015-06-18 11:13 GMT+01:00 Eli Zaretskii : >> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:50:01 +0100 >> From: Artur Malabarba >> Cc: emacs-devel , Stefan Monnier , stephen@xemacs.org >> >> > Btw, can the other patch be installed _in_addition_ to the first one? >> > IOW, they are orthogonal, or could be that, right? >> >> Yes, they should be orthogonal. One patch turns regular input strings into >> regexps, the other patch uses character folding tables which have always worked >> fine with regexps. > > So maybe we should have both, as separate features? You mean use case-tables for single-character folding everywhere and then use regexps only for multi-character folding in isearch?