From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 25 broken? Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:08:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <85wq37cidj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83h9ub6vm5.fsf@gnu.org> <85oaojc8q3.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424816253 11682 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2015 22:17:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 22:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 24 23:17:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YQNnI-0007E0-Gf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 23:17:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQNnH-0004gk-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53085) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQNer-0004qB-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:08:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQNeq-0004px-Qs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:08:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]:61596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQNeq-0004pq-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a3so22029431oib.7 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vJ+2ljI3rNdhZm2C9pJ8nEmh/NEmIYqjJmw5f9PprS8=; b=WBfHGGF5C46/M5Ma8oXjGMnHp0Z6mBMX7OGhk+y+mH2DYuz77som3vd6g5zoqV2KSP hONOL+klW43W4RBWWe++Tgl/KFdbSJ84npdU51p1lzz87u30IGIQKhAoyZChQPJWloz9 lrviRqKLRsG8qXaTVAN7mP2QZE2oyhhfZKF12CyCg944l9SpqgEC+ok3LNsI+F/8hsk9 01UuLa1tbnBizgmpiWNmF8n3FHaXbDvd+Q/N5Y02y9qpItyh8cQxWcSuHwKoWkEjpBHE 6yT7XSIpaaLZlvoS+5GEd0pb0XkIP4YtQ+yEyX8/v9qlOsVl0HJ+JFEBVIhG6h0KsjVT owMw== X-Received: by 10.60.59.97 with SMTP id y1mr58840oeq.17.1424815728310; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.76.130.17 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:08:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <85oaojc8q3.fsf@stephe-leake.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: CnvmMZDFyR6JJWZGTLHb6eqvcG0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183468 Archived-At: You mentioned using edebug. Having you tried exploring the bug with `(debug)' or `debug-on-entry' instead? 2015-02-24 21:15 GMT+00:00 Stephen Leake : > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Stephen Leake >>> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:46:32 -0600 >>> >>> Whenever I try to use emacs 25, something doesn't work right, and when >>> trying to debug it I always run into bug #19611; "e (current-buffer)" in >>> edebug returns the wrong buffer. >>> >>> Does anyone else see this problem? It's blocking all my work on master. >> >> Why do you need "e (current-buffer)" in Edebug so badly that it blocks >> your work? > > Seriously? If I can't trust the debugger, how am I supposed to make > progress? > > The real bug (in ada-mode) I'm trying to fix is in code that switches > buffers. (That bug does not exist when the same code is run in emacs > 24). Any expression I evaluate that relies on the current buffer is > wrong in the debugger, so it's impossible to figure out what's going on. > > I did not record in the bug that `with-current-buffer' is not broken; > executing M-x sal-debug gives the correct results. > > Any suggestions for further investigation? > > -- > -- Stephe >