Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 421e3c4: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents):

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 421e3c4: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents):

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com> writes:

> branch: emacs-25
> commit 421e3c4b2f14cfdf84a07095be1cbc76c9038da0
> Author: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>
> Commit: Artur Malabarba <bruce.connor.am@gmail.com>

>     * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents):

>     Don't change the value of `package-check-signature'.
>     (package-check-signature): Use `epg-find-configuration'
>     instead of `executable-find'.

Hi Artur; to which bug does this change refer?

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 421e3c4: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents):

[Paul Eggert]

On 05/20/2016 03:20 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
> Hi Artur; to which bug does this change refer?

Bug#22440, undoubtedly, though it's a bit convoluted....

Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 421e3c4: * lisp/emacs-lisp/package.el (package-refresh-contents):

[Artur Malabarba]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 388 bytes --]

Yes. The bug was closed before I had applied the second patch because I was
waiting for confirmation from the committer who wrote the code I was
changing.

On Fri, 20 May 2016 8:05 pm Paul Eggert, <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:

> On 05/20/2016 03:20 PM, John Wiegley wrote:
> > Hi Artur; to which bug does this change refer?
>
> Bug#22440, undoubtedly, though it's a bit convoluted....
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 649 bytes --]