From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: multishell Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:27:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87a8om1kas.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fbcbe6314dc0528864733 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451932107 18987 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2016 18:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Ken Manheimer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 19:28:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9rm-0005cA-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:28:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9rl-0003w7-ET for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:28:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9rF-0003r4-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:27:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9rE-0002xg-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:27:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]:36754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aG9rE-0002xc-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 13:27:52 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id v14so163280671ykd.3 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:27:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fiCuwA1B//Vtp/jFyzYv4T5e9TRQJnRQvE+MGOiZB0Q=; b=RQCDYb7yDid/aNEznO0TCgm4UxlEokoi6FxDFruH8hlAhlKb+5jdrk8kjlshIcT/Zb 88/Nd9ZU6YmvKVGi+1M3yDvabjei5jSEEz3NleCMcdcBp1j1DCo6PhXyPtIS4Hw3L6VP RyIXZX+PqctwdW7P2BV4xvzp3Upj7mX5qMAVWfYdTa3tgN0TNnlFKpzOdJf3905usFzL 0GiPOgeEimB/Y8+OmwS7f2lACttGAuL6wcyG69LtqYrxD5Knoi9z63yffFzjW9UdvJrh s+DWHG2bBj7zAyPLFM9pYhmN8Z+frFzVHBFeEaYLOigtV1CUg2nqdxnGST/F7Y7jLjvr mQdw== X-Received: by 10.13.226.13 with SMTP id l13mr66033501ywe.246.1451932071956; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 10:27:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:27:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.129.87.130 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:27:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3FSqxVHhPT-GFO59oiuA-YqvTk0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197619 Archived-At: --001a114fbcbe6314dc0528864733 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jan 4, 2016 3:07 PM, "Ken Manheimer" wrote: > It's been helpful, though, to shake out the release format with your and other's help - thanks for that! I hope it's not inopportune for me to defer the actual release after getting the code situated I don't see any problem. The only thing that comes to mind is that, if you don't want people to get used to the current version then you might want to remove the package from Elpa for the moment. I'm not sure if setting the version number to 0 will do that, or if it'll only prevent further updates. --001a114fbcbe6314dc0528864733 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On Jan 4, 2016 3:07 PM, "Ken Manheimer" <ken.manheimer@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been helpful, though, to shake out the release format with your and other's help - thanks for that! I hope it's not inopportune for me to defer the actual release after getting the code situated

I don't see any problem. The only thing that comes to mind is that, if you don't want people to get used to the current version then you might want to remove the package from Elpa for the moment.
I'm not sure if setting the version number to 0 will do that, or if it'll only prevent further updates.

--001a114fbcbe6314dc0528864733--