From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs logo proposal Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:58:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <876121mjdw.fsf@petton.fr> <87r3kpl3xp.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a871696174e05228eae19 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445371109 18284 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2015 19:58:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 21:58:28 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zod37-000446-0R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 21:58:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zod36-0006Ia-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zod31-0006H6-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zod30-0007oS-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]:36226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zod30-0007oG-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: by lbcao8 with SMTP id ao8so23445078lbc.3 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=f6GfettlOMAOo09YCHjafXN6quZep5wTL7IVLV22TbI=; b=xT0ST5i+21ayq8Z+dYQm0iPDtWoUX22H2iHp6KQgH0/HeEuJ8jkEMJuhWIBtJHqNgc vd1jB7McA3tqu+BPqXatDVoOJOXiloLRTd08ENnwCisbpL1tvQRdCbH9436x0ZJrvsSf VOsbyiDGxmKX3PYx3NMx2KrHIIHkUI8WdxQNyq0oryKCF1VQiXxegD7QoJ7GOgJhMdWz UKEeYA752oi38Zopi+tPflfTLO9Gga8i97Mui7gdzynSmx30PkPzN/pEofh3FazoseDl Fze78xWl+dgUeLYh/5IQpKIPBJDWY33c/fdrx4Vx3HwufjYEo+Zt4FYQRh3eEQnlQ/DI 0c9w== X-Received: by 10.112.145.232 with SMTP id sx8mr3009551lbb.4.1445371093323; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.22.197 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.22.197 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r3kpl3xp.fsf@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: YXqUwcc1tRPG5uHwTAPK6u-WeeU X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192231 Archived-At: --047d7b3a871696174e05228eae19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 20 Oct 2015 8:45 pm, "Jay Belanger" wrote: > I thought that part of the orientation was to make it look like an M as > well as an E. With a different orientation, should it have a different > shape? Then I must say that intent went unnoticed by me all these years. :-| I'd like a different shape, but either way Nicolas's current proposal is already a worthy improvement to my eyes. --047d7b3a871696174e05228eae19 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On 20 Oct 2015 8:45 pm, "Jay Belanger" <jay.p.belanger@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thought that part of the orientation was to make it look like an M a= s
> well as an E.=C2=A0 =C2=A0With a different orientation, should it have= a different
> shape?

Then I must say that intent went unnoticed by me all these y= ears. :-|

I'd like a different shape, but either way Nicolas's= current proposal is already a worthy improvement to my eyes.

--047d7b3a871696174e05228eae19--