From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20231: 25.0.50; package.el mangles non-ascii content in downloaded archive-contents data Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:31:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6343E9EC-9E23-4D44-9CD1-82C26DB7CDA3@sanityinc.com> <8292DA72-0898-47B2-A1C1-F7D94A52A437@sanityinc.com> <878udysfn2.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83mw2eecne.fsf@gnu.org> <874momsbsi.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <83egnqe9a9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428928342 1020 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2015 12:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: steve@sanityinc.com, Ivan Shmakov , 20231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 13 14:32:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdXA-0007Wc-Rx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:32:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdXA-000628-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdX4-00061z-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:32:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdX1-00070O-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdX0-00070G-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdX0-00016B-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20231.14289282914180 (code B ref 20231); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2015 12:31:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdWU-00015L-2Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:31:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:35873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YhdWS-000156-6C for 20231@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:31:28 -0400 Original-Received: by lagv1 with SMTP id v1so55724279lag.3 for <20231@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zx2xxIXLyIaQRk1ld8pIMcbMQ1zAb/i3BLRCA/m7gcc=; b=XXm9vXT4MjDzxubWKnTSJBkEMMXx0sUH8tCPGpszjZgtjaFJltDb+RMFG8hy4i9PT4 TcW0mKASpvTP3T1uUIU4Fy6CKO9Xcp5FKqmUw9Hgp9Oib7gikjJCqVTCkZsHyOgZI9+R WGcOUJVPd4jHz6cIzWmRy39/4GPal2wxdIeS6e9IJc69L/Dk/IGAvwJlZFohL8th5oIx OwEIh6wATome857Q6R+j9dFrMPTiXkb1aeh2ph8DcHElvkr9xda5q7D3ncl6awGyVWri PwHxlX0i7m4SUR4R/CilLwDTzN22mqdW1oRyE457ok0gzVARd2RT/sbYjTPWqmu2Yeg/ ntUg== X-Received: by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr13132600lbc.86.1428928282267; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.131 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:31:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83egnqe9a9.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: boq4fYNp0L12NQQRQYh9zRet-Co X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101470 Archived-At: >> I have no example at hand of how such processing may be >> triggered in practice, but avoiding it altogether seems to me >> like a saner approach. > > It is also slower. Again, I have no idea if speed matters in this > case. I vote for the fastest approach. Now that package-refresh can be done in the background, any post-processing done in the foreground is all the more noticeable by the user.