From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to inhibit message3 from Elisp? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:39:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87618psiu4.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8y1l3ho.fsf@gmail.com> <83618o4eom.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhhke5s1.fsf@gmail.com> <831tjc4ah3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c35152dc0a06051453a6b3 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429724435 21735 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2015 17:40:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Oleh , emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:40:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkydJ-0002Ip-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:40:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkydI-0007uG-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykycz-0007rY-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykycy-0001AQ-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]:32811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykycw-0001A4-Rz; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:39:59 -0400 Original-Received: by layy10 with SMTP id y10so180573510lay.0; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YiENiSDv6ORJeiXj4HjXNVpwXS05PTEWcSCnWfk/5E0=; b=AmpKCqG/1V0kqbMkeIbs0BgYlPJOH8pejXsIHbyYaxQJUP3lBPbfigAePjr9QlQHnh zWB/RdCENvZ9e8uJVqR9WzE5ne7Tsfp2m5hW0gumCGB6Zvw/Sgk+VFhDybq3YweumUkA MbzcLlV3AOuJzLhjUukKsr/fn73bh1jd5oY+dHQMDkaF5RAVbaUc+tJkWwDGrWvyYTwh 1g97OQPYL1FT+4GUnk27w/6lVuqQ5vC8MqAJCiBQwpbqgxy5k08oir/cV7nIbSBphQOr lbwrBChN5gvbOOSeX9sAGbDYEA7WmqXieTnWxWDgXCb8YGF4YFt2wWPGYDgn2BP9u9Az rLuA== X-Received: by 10.152.43.110 with SMTP id v14mr25454479lal.4.1429724397831; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.150.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:39:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: qAK1LhO2QKU8CHfNzFz-0pb_QQE X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185788 Archived-At: --001a11c35152dc0a06051453a6b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Apr 22, 2015 3:51 PM, "Stefan Monnier" wrote: > > > I think it's OK, with a few minor comments: > > > +** New variable `inhibit-message', when bound to t, inhibits the > > No, as I said I want a variable to *redirect* not to inhibit, I think that's independent of this. Which buffer the messages are stored in is unrelated to whether they get displayed on the echo area. --001a11c35152dc0a06051453a6b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Apr 22, 2015 3:51 PM, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> > I think it's OK, with a few minor comments:
>
> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0+** New variable `inhibit-message', when bound to= t, inhibits the
>
> No, as I said I want a variable to *redirect* not to inhibit,

I think that's independent of this. Which buffer the mes= sages are stored in is unrelated to whether they get displayed on the echo = area.

--001a11c35152dc0a06051453a6b3--