From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 01:01:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87d1vvfa1k.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3k95ppo.fsf@cumego.com> <87mvuomik1.fsf@cumego.com> <87bnb4nqvz.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8qoxjez.fsf@cumego.com> <87r3jzhvz2.fsf@cumego.com> <87vb9aojhi.fsf@petton.fr> <87wptpsjhv.fsf@cumego.com> <87y4e4zd8b.fsf@petton.fr> <87r3jly3oh.fsf@petton.fr> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c240d0d27cd70524ee6a10 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447981367 10912 80.91.229.3 (20 Nov 2015 01:02:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 01:02:47 +0000 (UTC) To: Nicolas Petton , =?UTF-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw_Wojnowski?= , Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 02:02:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zza5O-0008CC-L1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 02:01:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zza5I-0003KU-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:01:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zza54-0003Jd-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zza53-0006BF-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]:33265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zza53-0006BB-EA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:01:37 -0500 Original-Received: by lbbkw15 with SMTP id kw15so53700990lbb.0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:01:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/gt+K1gMRlidbetbeyumRT4Ih38YsAdUw4hobantDW0=; b=aII4qMiMwwD6Oo7v+XD53EtvYGPsxNB6n+liT1UuHNYRXcNnMILTg/IXbkxEVcrwyQ zRY8DZnMd3rZHbSMykAj9qrMspExscTgaVet+og9CezqAIrOMJW3iTP2rzf1KzVAFGL7 wdCFbzja6btOY2+Mwh9TIcYW1q2K+HGu9OJJjX1axGHNjCSyORKAmJ/HTltpQp3FBSa0 GPdlAsK5iKIpLBg/jPnggYCn4UNMAt1DmAQCe2a6j55ItZs/ptQoS8k0sQkWyd3aIrWB JXWPq9aKb91Mr2CbWcIgNOBQlkYg9S2YgsK+iwwBVzgH0ZMl1SSTyihUP06hIBg4eENL lbBw== X-Received: by 10.112.159.2 with SMTP id wy2mr4691156lbb.102.1447981296546; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:01:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.202.99 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:01:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: FbHBhSVYqg8W5EQY7k-CevMRN2M X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194843 Archived-At: --001a11c240d0d27cd70524ee6a10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I didn't quite get what this "second patch" is. Is it just fixes for obarray.el or something new? 2015-11-20 0:13 GMT+00:00 John Wiegley : > >>>>> Nicolas Petton writes: > > > One question: I was offline the last few days, and I missed the emacs-25 > > branch discussion. I guess I should not push this to emacs-25 as we are > > already in feature freeze? > > You are right, it should go to master, since it represents a new API with > new > accompanying documentation. > > John > --001a11c240d0d27cd70524ee6a10 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I didn't quite get what this "second patch&q= uot; is. Is it just fixes for obarray.el or something new?

2015-11-20 0:13 GMT+00= :00 John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Nicolas Petton <nicolas@petton.fr> writes:

> One question: I was offline the last few days, and I missed the emacs-= 25
> branch discussion. I guess I should not push this to emacs-25 as we ar= e
> already in feature freeze?

You are right, it should go to master, since it represents a new API with n= ew
accompanying documentation.

John

--001a11c240d0d27cd70524ee6a10--