From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22991: 25.0.92: C-u C-s does not display "Regexp I-search:" in the echo area Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:29:24 -0300 Message-ID: References: <83ziu4hh1r.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpp8hgdy.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8m44md6.fsf@web.de> <83h9gcgmor.fsf@gnu.org> <87twkbwbwf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <95c9a103-69cb-4500-bc87-7aec290caf7c@default> <87ziu22bg8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a8m1enih.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0812f2aad712052e04c860 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457973022 486 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2016 16:30:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 22991@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Kaushal Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 14 17:30:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNj-0004vs-00 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:30:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42240 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNi-0006w0-8z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNe-0006u1-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNa-0006Qa-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNa-0006QV-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1afVNZ-0003SW-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:30:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Artur Malabarba Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22991.145797297213236 (code B ref 22991); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:30:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Mar 2016 16:29:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48044 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1afVN6-0003RQ-0V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:29:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com ([209.85.161.182]:36147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1afVN4-0003RD-C4 for 22991@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:29:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f182.google.com with SMTP id g3so174072795ywa.3 for <22991@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc; bh=exrr6sJTwdzXOrLJahSiGIHkNz/nbExfuRJlaOp3+Nk=; b=nTkuBEMTN/bylz0yC33a0z9fR/CsoEHmVB+EcM+cD6z3Pol32Upmlc6HKEwgTt5Zzy tj10C3pKTaEfOtGYBfejLpcGW9ZFAmjqFq0Qu4wqCGNg/N8N54kf3Xru/9sC18D8L4XW mf/B9rdzZ00BZ0CDi4EWdelXMREyp59YYJHSi9m0EgNyTiyL7PLcJD14M+UxNg2uWb7c cQwx6lnMEAO1kYfv2wGmXAk3kLU8GLZAUn6J+x1k7AhQ4nVxU4zJV6clTDr6X+wK3ios l9LQek1fICmnii52b6MWCm/PO+PSqDkOFwukZbwD9S+WAUMtDWI24D834MgmxQHLKSw+ vDeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=exrr6sJTwdzXOrLJahSiGIHkNz/nbExfuRJlaOp3+Nk=; b=TgyGGAnaPWe7bozuahNF9xVOAAEteQ88uGCj80Wr6hl+KGsglMYF0shXTmxF4HwpBn bE7KLyGyp422hp/p72Hop1X539d7DHV26haOrzmvbyI4esJpjeB53mN4veWqXx0WxMzQ +79wqsmxHPkVBuFgANfrN1c1TEYsvywmGejRebYjwPZbKb346hU/nB4o+cgB1KKG5PDD +z72tm7ZkD3yBEVuZJ7hqvsmZ8ktxuFHGqSPugJIFd9/+sUOeK4iNZEDfRzCosntcYuN mqJRUIMFyUzsyJoyBf6FjyBB+oFv4LeLEyaqPSlXI6m8d86bKOo6tTgcVsof+7tZeFQJ 8sbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK1JnGg9ZDC2m9UcB9TmlkdAL7teej3fi8d70QTJsSFA64Or4PGd/9yL4RmjJafzSpZX6bgY6JmZQue8w== X-Received: by 10.129.129.198 with SMTP id r189mr12574196ywf.107.1457972964936; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.31.5 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.31.5 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: zOeboBq6ByX7BnAQSEPRDHa1Xe4 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114895 Archived-At: --94eb2c0812f2aad712052e04c860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 14 Mar 2016 10:50 am, "Kaushal Modi" wrote: > > Looks like this discussion is going in loops. > > Summary: > > (1) I believe that the patch I have fixes the bug I reported and the one Eli pointed out. And it does so without bringing a drastic change to the way the description string is generated. I can't push for the time being, but I agree with the patch. Eli, if you agree with it too, could you push it? TIA --94eb2c0812f2aad712052e04c860 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On 14 Mar 2016 10:50 am, "Kaushal Modi" <kaushal.modi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like this discussion is going in loops.
>
> Summary:
>
> (1) I believe that the patch I have fixes the bug I reported and the one Eli pointed out. And it does so without bringing a drastic change to the way the description string is generated.

I can't push for the time being, but I agree with the patch.

Eli, if you agree with it too, could you push it?
TIA

--94eb2c0812f2aad712052e04c860--