From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [Emacs-diffs] master 188f657: Fix false negatives in tex--prettify-symbols-compose-p. Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:51:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20150925210512.18505.12538@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737xxjtkq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113458189a71890520f232b3 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443676537 30570 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 05:15:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 05:15:37 +0000 (UTC) To: Davis Herring , emacs-devel , Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 07:15:36 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhWDQ-0006nP-3k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:15:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhWDP-0003hL-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 01:15:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCAj-0007H1-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:51:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCAj-0005O3-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:51:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]:32928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhCAh-0005ND-Gw; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 03:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: by lahh2 with SMTP id h2so36126271lah.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:51:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XhD9qnvogKIpdcSFvNv131TLPHKz32gxisHGmxZAd1s=; b=olirqqGeOOkXfx7r0RogAJ8orILu9KeloWdENgpVpEYFB7ZxjCCpJgJDukz4cF3U05 fn+bqCxOTN6VTXSVJp9b4vUv3AR1F2wSFdTCOLgrkkxAZ8+eE4XfDCixApn1mk14+2Hr dLiga/Ay/QEbwBdtMUqrVonTAzeI/Gi1tQYPdsipnoLQZjBiDrWp7GATprpNJxNvKszv ALG7DP7RnnUToPtmEgZj6a9Bg87zaBXH62pbV0FD1vcRnyAPuAGGbdY56weFmHlya0It Z7OaZOq2mWHIiMbGo+uULUfuE/z9je3iCemvkf8mhtfQiGknIyQJogG8iKsnyrl7Q3cB HBWw== X-Received: by 10.153.7.140 with SMTP id dc12mr696852lad.16.1443599486707; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.27.78 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:51:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.25.27.78 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 00:51:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: tfa5uI22zOs2IIgBXOYbrylv8FI X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190505 Archived-At: --001a113458189a71890520f232b3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 30 Sep 2015 4:12 am, "Herring, Davis" wrote: > > Could mimicking (better: merging with) the approach of reveal-mode help? > > Davis Now that Tassilo seems to have it working, I don't think it's worth mimicking something else. However, if the feature can be simplified by merging with reveal mode then that would surely be nice. --001a113458189a71890520f232b3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On 30 Sep 2015 4:12 am, "Herring, Davis" <herring@lanl.gov> wrote:
>
> Could mimicking (better: merging with) the approach of reveal-mode help?
>
> Davis

Now that Tassilo seems to have it working, I don't think it's worth mimicking something else. However, if the feature can be simplified by merging with reveal mode then that would surely be nice.

--001a113458189a71890520f232b3--