From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New assoc-let package Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:23:23 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87mw72q5z2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874mt9o5w5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k322jtpw.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a84c09b47aa0509b8856e X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418063033 11147 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2014 18:23:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 19:23:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy2yH-0004D1-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:23:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35420 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy2yG-0005Y1-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy2xx-0005Us-Pk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy2xw-000142-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:23:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]:47115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xy2xw-00013S-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 13:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so4517347lab.12 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:23:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=XLgKZ0DmLAdGyHicWVCNoSPXoboAz7yeq6a1h0ZrGLY=; b=CoafPHG3h0OjjaNrqorZJU3+8JDWEoK5G/rBx6wL/om8mftQAB8MR/A7jQYiSf781d Vmi8+ROcINN3QFG7STS87JhCsImkS3AhzYTgU2/VbsDtVWYu4wCkiAQZK5WEggcDFBLm 5elcwEbesbmCQ+IimMikykUp89UhbrKFnvZ/Xg0QCdT7JQECm+AzkNPNsk1ynWHhhPt7 wgC/JDzCYEANhVAmSUHRukkewJ77X2KzeCjESzKISfr0ogvH/6zWyIPH2oHG4n3Y0+yP vi0uxxvVeR43vAQTg0ZNhCiElHgMWzOWegHX++26KUlAkgDc+PBO94FGAF457k8ws+8D eI6A== X-Received: by 10.112.130.132 with SMTP id oe4mr17692078lbb.82.1418063003729; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:23:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.53.137 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:23:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.53.137 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 10:23:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: G8NhTrq_GSjnV9qtj6nQWdbcUVk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179434 Archived-At: --047d7b3a84c09b47aa0509b8856e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 8 Dec 2014 12:59, "Stefan Monnier" wrote: > > > I would change the package name to `let-assoc' so it starts with the > > thing it resembles, but otherwise I still think it would be useful. > > I don't see why "assoc" rather than "alist". > TBH, I'm entirely neutral on this whole name thing. All options sound equally fine to me. --047d7b3a84c09b47aa0509b8856e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

On 8 Dec 2014 12:59, "Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> > I would change the package name to `let-assoc' so it starts with the
> > thing it resembles, but otherwise I still think it would be useful.
>
> I don't see why "assoc" rather than "alist".
>

TBH, I'm entirely neutral on this whole name thing. All options sound equally fine to me.

--047d7b3a84c09b47aa0509b8856e--