From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Menus with more items than the TTY can display Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 06:51:57 +0800 Message-ID: References: <83a9igrqq1.fsf@gnu.org> <5257E3B3.4070508@yandex.ru> <834n8nswas.fsf@gnu.org> <831u3nrhf9.fsf@gnu.org> <525D8938.6080208@gmx.at> <83hacipd88.fsf@gnu.org> <525E43D8.6060109@gmx.at> <83bo2pp7kd.fsf@gnu.org> <525ED0CE.9010001@gmx.at> <834n8hozdu.fsf@gnu.org> <525EDC1A.9070201@gmx.at> <831u3loxcy.fsf@gnu.org> <525FAD69.9010901@gmx.at> <83ppr3ookb.fsf@gnu.org> <52601A31.1040603@gmx.at> <83a9i7njs5.fsf@gnu.org> <83d2n1n1tf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382223121 8456 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2013 22:52:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 00:52:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VXfNO-0003CL-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:52:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34622 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXfNN-0003DS-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41011) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXfNK-0003DB-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXfNJ-00034l-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]:57610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXfNG-000343-Rg; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:51:58 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id to1so11965611ieb.37 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TnPgKxZzFNNPlkriTF23AZmX9CZUaJKNT3odM43jP+c=; b=QJY1c5bpdk1yrQHfxRYXqrM3FoObQL0YY1DxH7rh93j8+3+RRdXXqiElOYUvvmdfrz Ln0LG73KohGjqcz4k9tUbMAYST88/n9D+yIO7KBdn+PkW4VfmuY90L/2fCWDACq2fnBY 7vPQ+P86N3L7M7G6d9Zh6d2zxA15m+SPNlmD8RNBpOzOBKqMrGMaEyH2tsfoYszJgyjc yV6ji0aCEns/4CYARv/a6cF85DVCBXn7vIAWIjyruf9klAUgfUGEV+8TM3MAKAVbL23S XVjjPW3TZDgSJpb4TX1P8j/WrJl+jvoIzkG5p4na5052C5o7xuf245NvT63kKVs9ZDXE nI8g== X-Received: by 10.50.85.114 with SMTP id g18mr4427610igz.15.1382223117569; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.42.133.72 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83d2n1n1tf.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164385 Archived-At: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > Is it possible that gnome-terminal lies to us about its height, when >> > you disable its own menu bar? What do the following evaluate to, in >> > the situation where you see the problem? >> > >> > M-: (window-height) RET >> >> 22 (#o26, #x16) >> >> > M-: (window-screen-lines) RET >> >> 21.0 > > What happens if you do not disable the menu bar of gnome-terminal? > (If F10 does the wrong thing then, you can invoke menu-bar-open by its > name via M-x.) Do the TTY menus work correctly then? Yes. > And what are the values returned by the above functions in that case? The same as above. -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/