Personally, I would vote "yes", but I wonder what others think?

Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> 於 2018年8月14日 週二 上午5:04寫道：

> On 13 August 2018 at 11:12, 路客 <luke.yx.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > New package "brief" is now officially released in master packages/brief.
> > The temporary branch scratch/brief is deleted.
> > Hope you enjoy it!
>
> I notice there is this comment about "crisp.el":
>
> ;; There is also an Emacs version of "crisp.el" which is now obsolete
> ;; but still (temporarily) exists in the Emacs source code repository
> ;; at "<emacs>/src/lisp/obsolete/crisp.el".  In case of it being
> ;; removed from Emacs source tree someday, I moved the whole
> ;; development history from Emacs source into ELPA repository at
> ;; "<elpa>/packages/crisp".[...]
>
> Does that mean the "crisp" GNU ELPA package should be considered
> obsolete (with "brief" being the replacement)?
>


-- 
Best regards,
Luke Lee