all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tadeus Prastowo <tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lexical binding: why?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 14:01:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA1Ytmukt2H=FNL5cZFoOy0ttvO+11trpOxzD0SVe06i5MROuw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190528100850.GA5296@ACM>

Hi Alan,

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:53 PM Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> wrote:
>
> Hello, Emacs.
>
> What is the purpose of converting Lisp files to use lexical binding?

AFAIK, the primary objective is to allow a multi-threaded Emacs.

> I always thought the idea was to speed the SW up.  However, when I tried
> converting CC Mode to lexical binding, I got the following timings for
> two of my personal benchmarks:
>
>                   Dynamic binding             Lexical binding
>
> Benchmark 1           7.249s                      7.423s
>
> Benchmark 2          16.743s                     16.691s
>
> .  I thus see no speedup from the use of lexical binding.

Perhaps it is because a multi-threaded Emacs has not arrived yet?

> Have I, perhaps, made some mistake somewhere?  Does anybody else see
> significant speed increases through the use of lexical binding?
>
> --
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).

-- 
Best regards,
Tadeus



  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-28 10:08 Lexical binding: why? Alan Mackenzie
2019-05-28 12:01 ` Tadeus Prastowo [this message]
2019-05-28 12:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-05-28 13:02   ` Dmitry Gutov
2019-05-28 13:25     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-05-28 13:46       ` Dmitry Gutov
2019-05-28 13:44   ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-05-28 17:21     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-05-28 17:41       ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-05-28 17:58         ` Stefan Monnier
2019-05-28 15:19 ` John Wiegley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA1Ytmukt2H=FNL5cZFoOy0ttvO+11trpOxzD0SVe06i5MROuw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tadeus.prastowo@unitn.it \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.