From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Hisch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange ido-mode behaviour Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:36:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r4xyhiuj.fsf@googlemail.com> <81vcmxicn0.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330029401 6011 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2012 20:36:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Thorsten To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 21:36:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fP5-00012B-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:36:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fP4-0005dC-Pe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:36:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fP0-0005Zm-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:36:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fOz-0002UU-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:36:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:33592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S0fOz-0002UJ-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: by vcbf13 with SMTP id f13so1418332vcb.0 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of t.hisch@gmail.com designates 10.52.173.179 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.173.179; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of t.hisch@gmail.com designates 10.52.173.179 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=t.hisch@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=t.hisch@gmail.com Original-Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.173.179]) by 10.52.173.179 with SMTP id bl19mr1701486vdc.103.1330029392618 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J4+cE/ZTX8fuqwn/Bnntoq2V0LZ71l9jBWs2ILnKICM=; b=ItVJbGM3fLXUyjk8BOjt0O2onO0KAyZUMnF86H7tDpUtQXyxunppgXjTWdStUP0DaP YBoqaVGO17jeq5a52FkLz4Ewt9gAxQa3Rfdmg4sU+wk5vElBGuIto9bht8l4Y3s3cPn/ VH6rfjOTEt+XexAzpRBIk9ErRwQsSUeLo2r7Y= Original-Received: by 10.52.173.179 with SMTP id bl19mr1413919vdc.103.1330029392564; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.220.150.69 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:36:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <81vcmxicn0.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.220.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148748 Archived-At: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jambunathan K wrote: > Thomas Hisch writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Thorsten wrote: >>> >>> Hallo list, >>> I used ido-mode quite a while with emacs23 for finding files, and was >>> very satisfied. Now, after changing to emacs24 [GNU Emacs 24.0.93.1 >>> (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10) of 2012-02-07 on arch] >>> ido somehow tries to be too smart when I want to find a non-existing >>> file (when I want to create a new file). >>> Ido uses the word under or near point and immedeatly starts a search >>> in the file-system for a file with a similar name. I don't even have the >>> opportunity to do C-f and then type the name of the new file without any >>> ido interference. >>> Maybe I missed something in the configuration, but creating a new file >>> with ido-mode enabled is a bit painfull now. >>> cheers >>> Thorsten >> >> I would also like to know a solution for this ido 'problem' ... > > Does bumping up the value of `ido-auto-merge-delay-time' work for you? It's an ugly solution but it works, thx!