From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Noah Slater Subject: Re: Problem with org-clock-display Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:58:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874n1s74bm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86zjjirbjo.fsf@somewhere.org> <87fvlak8cq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86k3amist6.fsf@somewhere.org> <87mwfhhp6m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sip8nzkp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3aknyjw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86ppkcl1o9.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ppkci3o4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf305b0abca6f07704f778f096 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbrKc-0002tb-KL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:58:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbrKW-0002mS-Mh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:58:50 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbrKW-0002mO-F6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:58:44 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WbrKV-0002hM-9g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:58:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ppkci3o4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org, Sebastien Vauban --20cf305b0abca6f07704f778f096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess Sebastien's point is that without a custom face, the only way to turn the dots off is to set the shadow face to be hidden. But that could have unintended side-effects. So if there's no custom face, then there should be a config so that people can turn it off without having to deal with those side-effects. On 20 April 2014 14:30, Bastien wrote: > > > Hi S=E9bastien, > > Sebastien Vauban > writes: > > > If you don't like to add a face, then I'd also favor the possibility to > > turn off the display of dots -- without having to touch the shadow face= --20cf305b0abca6f07704f778f096--