From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alin Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabs are ready? -> Let us give a definition of tabs. Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:05:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4F2E5D33.6020406@gmx.at> <4F2E8185.4080706@gmx.at> <4F2EC73A.8020905@gmx.at> <4F2FACF8.2040304@gmx.at> <4F3007E8.6090209@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae934104d6f47dc04b8513028 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328558768 22376 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 20:06:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Juanma Barranquero , Emacs Dev To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 21:06:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuUpD-0001xz-0d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:06:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuUpC-0006qM-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuUp4-0006cZ-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuUoy-0001Xv-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:05:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:47212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuUoy-0001Xm-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: by ghrr18 with SMTP id r18so3344638ghr.0 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4EAyf2ekj3oESSZ1yMNp59RXWd6oXDZXFPR3NvCB/0M=; b=PP43b5z9/aNiN/oL7Dmp3LDQTtZ5lXHMT/rWErsYC2sbEMjMlsEUyPGOw/1+2d11WW i2AtIpyvf5quZy1omDujWKG3Vcs09mE2k7aHK4f8fd7+pMNHIrjUH4FG3ImbZBUfCe84 06rowTqjxVXrMRz1ZGKC1c4i7QHyE5RQKYmAA= Original-Received: by 10.50.184.233 with SMTP id ex9mr22924020igc.23.1328558751303; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:05:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.231.42.209 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:05:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3007E8.6090209@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.85.160.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148283 Archived-At: --14dae934104d6f47dc04b8513028 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I received lots of messages , and I will not respond all now, sorry. I just want to say, that if we do not agree on a definition of tabs that are VERY GENERAL , that means , to be able to programm them from the first version to do everything you think that a tab should/could do , then another implementation/definition of tabs is loss of time. But as time as you can programm in elisp a buffer/a window to behave as you wish, why it would not be possible to create tabs that could be programmable ? Stephen : The junk with the events, etc was just a supposition. If you have better idea, tell us how to do it. --14dae934104d6f47dc04b8513028 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I received lots of messages , and I will not respond al= l now, sorry.

I just want to say, that if we do no= t agree on a definition of tabs that are VERY GENERAL , that means , to be = able to programm them from the first version to do everything you think tha= t a tab should/could do , then another implementation/definition of tabs is= loss of time.

But as time as you can programm in elisp a buffer/a win= dow to behave as you wish, why it would not be possible to create tabs that= could be programmable ?=C2=A0

Stephen : The junk = with the events, etc was just a supposition. If you have better idea, tell = us how to do it.


--14dae934104d6f47dc04b8513028--