From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vibhav Pant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] json: Add support for encoding structs Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:57:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: <874lxeq6mz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pog1pqdn.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493123272 8906 195.159.176.226 (25 Apr 2017 12:27:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:27:52 +0000 (UTC) To: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , tzz@lifelogs.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 25 14:27:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2zZK-0002Bw-Gm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49122 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2zZQ-0006O5-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2zZK-0006No-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2zZI-0000qN-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]:34126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2zZH-0000pH-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:27:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id k11so48059870ywb.1 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:27:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=i0O+zTSR/Y8OqKxyR0S7hJt42gOWkRikLTNQL4wt7+Q=; b=bryN7YoU8w9w6ED6z7CyiPRT0TqlMW4xM9HteMCwoIR3NBfitjwhEUeCXTWs+uGOv1 9nFxkK0xH7+78hX6Hq1SaCnReR1IDjgZ0eh4EoRWuOfeQtMzSAKIpIRCdaKpiQLHHc5L 5ZSUY57b44sPk7eO7p7juaFbiSteZ7lUN/2koD6YWaVPuSBuPub0McnxFwMoOAnteBml JbqoykhNT5Apr/KlcW/Nk1M94aToUnicFBj68UyWONLVmxOz4cn/kTyahRdB1ygCWCbd zqxZAr0C6iuo1fJo9SLV0KGcJMJIuC442U1vjJV4yUIZfl19YzrVZzujzXLp+MUsFfaD J2+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=i0O+zTSR/Y8OqKxyR0S7hJt42gOWkRikLTNQL4wt7+Q=; b=mzhyfLmr5bzQV42CDcTJEqxxP8EEsLh6I8zPxs/PZO28oXeshICrHpgU2Y0E6VBN5e shbQm5uCzYzeIA6REo+65P6yupTDjI6/8oaWIEM23K+kl8SXktal6ZhsS6SagyQCdN+m cH8AVjWf4wX82Wh05uYVWdu235Kfr/LWtJtsNbaPjJdJGsAI0Am8VYJ4/1PlronBwGEi 1f7qaHYFXy+j28+sZ1hD62/iTTwGC4WEl0hq5ur5KOelmdDyTNrENovOkcJw8B5M6Ae9 2OYJPcge9i04XcdK+1hFLGTwsb/E5AWV5j0/qYq8us+S/hgyMRoQ41BVMHGNInS1dSBu G86A== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5uppPquLFMPm7/V/DflZD3gPSKVBx8vCdvNY86AvurA6GX8Zi3 o7me9mDu+ZbTDDuJwznTKBUvjKqsdA== X-Received: by 10.129.98.212 with SMTP id w203mr8702328ywb.79.1493123263124; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.129.117.85 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:27:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pog1pqdn.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214282 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > I also want to ask if the keywords could be less JSON-specific, since > other serializers could be used. So you'd use keywords like > :serialize-field, :serialize-ignore, :serialize-to-type instead of the > ones you proposed. Done! > Finally, maybe we could also consider using the existing facility > :print-function (the manual says that's currently unused). But I don't > know the full implications of that, so maybe it's a bad suggestion. Wouldn't that restrict encoding only to JSON?, I think passing all (json) encoding through json.el would be a better design. Thanks, Vibhav -- Vibhav Pant vibhavp@gmail.com