From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Vibhav Pant Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ERC: support for IRCv3.1 CAP Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:30:34 +0530 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114212f245e5c8053d1c709c X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474572296 22248 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2016 19:24:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:24:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kelvin White Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 21:24:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9bo-0003Dy-6a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:24:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9bl-0007m5-9r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:24:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn8Ia-0006gh-9l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn8IW-0005dB-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:00:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]:33750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn8IW-0005cu-6i; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 11so41657736qtc.0; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZtfnMldFJyvwHwhWdWRZSmblm/6uqqj0dIUNSME2Ia0=; b=QRvmbLX9DzZNh8zoGSAhbhMdVh+S44LV0irJhK7iC1liotqHgG1rRpAcjtHvbyOLDR HudGAXswzc2l/BsEECg7KEL8dT8Z186ExawFsSD9EjtisvsOz9oFkbuPsijEX8lnxI+u jUltXF6MDiSVSj4jfvZ2+5EUwWM3RCbC7CEGAFtOGGyhZTNyUuwTcH4m+b0FQodJ7rkZ VLLvOykHeG8RJG8oicOCjglSna8Utm450xtPiYqG/bM0tIse7pavRZxnU8ZPOVc2bdRY mdv//rvgd7Lxh0esvj4jcd80/50fs+9c8IfdPXsRzrCfY5D6JoZ0J82Q1pKSoYyMNSXM bBzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZtfnMldFJyvwHwhWdWRZSmblm/6uqqj0dIUNSME2Ia0=; b=RruWj33wJm/aVJsqvFWAitwllO4Il0J+gknYu4OOYzzkTP84sXqQRtNJkWGL9SdDCr G6kUgKcOnSz689WX0UAuPnQ0AU4TVZIfslWYLvMLjTnM+JaUwe6EhcD7DiEm751BJoYi ALe/+oioo+gbeztibygrsdZuzAIOo2DT8G1ab9Zg/tIjfFP8+HfIkyfUhIeQ+5MfQHWU EcINzCqJ/DFcBKc9Cecc2JYIF5M6orND5QQnmt/EP0SLnGI4Z0ML+2pO18ho4NUa0WpM BwTY/L4BxI5rXhdEvogsOeRGayPe3m87waeoizGRWFWLMwxmaNX4bSY6rNSZiRKQ2HvE 7IXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rk+r56FrbtFdv/LWoEKkTqNMVJBxikJCN8AisZ3uA5xr5FzLgDAA46W/PKunh9TNzX2vam5xBRThB38lA== X-Received: by 10.237.36.168 with SMTP id t37mr2224208qtc.132.1474567235559; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.140.81.165 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.140.81.165 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:00:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207708 Archived-At: --001a114212f245e5c8053d1c709c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Adding support for message tags would require significant changes to ERC's message parser. I'd suppose it is well suited for master instead of 25.2. On 22 Sep 2016 23:21, "John Wiegley" wrote: > >>>>> "VP" == Vibhav Pant writes: > > VP> Now that Emacs 25.1 is out, could this be reviewed again? I'd like to > add > VP> support for more IRCv3 features (http://ircv3.net/irc/) for this > VP> development cycle. > > How destabilizing do you think these changes will be? If it's significant > new > development, then 'master' is the best place. But if they are minor, and > purely additions, I suppose we could consider it for 25.2. > > -- > John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F > http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 > --001a114212f245e5c8053d1c709c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Adding support for message tags would require significant ch= anges to ERC's message parser. I'd suppose it is well suited for ma= ster instead of 25.2.


On 22 Sep 2016 23= :21, "John Wiegley" <jwi= egley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> "VP" =3D=3D Vibhav Pant <vibhavp@gmail.com> writes:

VP> Now that Emacs 25.1 is out, could this be reviewed again? I'd li= ke to add
VP> support for more IRCv3 features (http://ircv3.net/irc/) for this
VP> development cycle.

How destabilizing do you think these changes will be?=C2=A0 If it's sig= nificant new
development, then 'master' is the best place.=C2=A0 But if they are= minor, and
purely additions, I suppose we could consider it for 25.2.

--
John Wiegley=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
htt= p://newartisans.com=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
--001a114212f245e5c8053d1c709c--