On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
wrote:

>
> It's probably easier (and more portable) to use another frame
> (which is displayed "at the top" and then hidden/destroyed).
>

​Yes, maybe I'll have to settle for displaying some kind of transient
message in place of displaying the frame itself.
Seems a shame to create and destroy a frame just to provide some feedback.
Or I live with just having the frame
end up somewhere else in the stack since it likely will be utilized soon in
this case.

Bob