From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Weiner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bug #23794; sort-line behavior regressed from prior Emacs versions Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:31:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83shwa9zmr.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh229ywc.fsf@gnu.org> <83inx69xcx.fsf@gnu.org> <0984ce22-cbcf-42a6-906e-a03b65f3c71c@default> <8360t5aolu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rswgnu@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dddfacd79de0535a19bd2 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466343188 6528 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2016 13:33:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 13:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 19 15:33:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcqU-00054W-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 15:33:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcqQ-000880-Lr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcpU-00086Q-4j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcpP-000233-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:31:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcpP-00022a-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52]:33962) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bEcpF-0005ew-U2; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 09:31:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id d132so177140438oig.1; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:31:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKvd+FBBqCEWEdQVJkv7k8708o3mWF9SlZz6XHD+W+wZQ4rCPcdheTjopahX2GnJwWPPA8R4AtcyoxC1w== X-Received: by 10.202.192.5 with SMTP id q5mr6064300oif.22.1466343103478; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.202.236.73 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 06:31:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8360t5aolu.fsf@gnu.org> X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204508 Archived-At: --001a113dddfacd79de0535a19bd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The proposal was to make it the only behavior. > That was how the patch was written but it could easily be changed if the core team will just say what would be acceptable. Do you want a new option variable that can be used by multiple functions to pay attention to or ignore invisible newlines with a default that would be the same as things work now? Or would you like just an optional flag for sort-lines that outline modes could use to minimize any change? Then we can move on to other things. Bob --001a113dddfacd79de0535a19bd2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wr= ote:
The proposal was to make it the only behavior.

That was how the patch was written but it could= easily be changed if the core team will just say what would be acceptable.= =C2=A0 Do you want a new option variable that can be used by multiple funct= ions to pay attention to or ignore invisible newlines with a default that w= ould be the same as things work now?=C2=A0 Or would you like just an option= al flag for sort-lines that outline modes could use to minimize any change?= =C2=A0 Then we can move on to other things.

Bob



--001a113dddfacd79de0535a19bd2--