It's wrong in that if you type RET, Emacs rejects it.


On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 21:22 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

> (Please keep the debbugs address in the Cc header, otherwise the bug
> tracker won't get the email.)
>
> Vladimir Nikishkin <lockywolf@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I experimented with it a bit just now. Indeed, not every suggested font
> is
> > broken. However, autocompletion still suggests some broken font
> descriptions.
> >
> > To reproduce:
> >
> > M-x set-frame-font RET
> > -gnu-unifont-sans-16-*-7 TAB RET produces a wrong font description.
> >
> > And I didn't deliberately concoct such a string myself, I obtained it by
> typing -gnu
> > TAB, and typing in a few suggestion characters, which I don't remember,
> but
> > which were swallowed by Emacs just fine.
> >
> > Something like
> > M-x set-frame-font RET
> > -gnu TAB -sa TAB 1 TAB 7 TAB
> >
> > For example, in my case, I'm getting the line:
> >
> > -gnu-unifont-sans-16-*-75-75-c-80-iso10646-1
>
> I'm unable to reproduce this bug, because Debian doesn't seem to include
> any fonts that have a "gnu" in the foundry name (or perhaps I've just
> installed the wrong package?).
>
> But in what way is that font description wrong?
>
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
>    bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
>