From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Aptel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About GSoC 2013 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:03:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87y5cahgbv.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366653826 2866 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2013 18:03:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 22 20:03:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UUL5g-0007NV-Lz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:03:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44957 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUL5g-0004KG-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUL5Y-0004Bs-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUL5X-0005bz-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:03:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com ([209.85.217.179]:54955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUL5X-0005bn-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t1so5821633lbd.24 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YRNNzuPIxn9izWQMvjWzNPvbCh3+Nvyq6SKwVZVLcV8=; b=Lvc2ms/wVPfdaV/a6EsA5bedblMR6OgRjFrGE3eIkRfwm0lACupfGDUxvfkaFwSeNp 2ml82lkTUpylBEhrC1VFLeOwFa4b8QsVNW7gzhssrBGr3C20j3iWJQ0nZCBMHUH7XXLq STZUUovNPMn7aTf61xebNtASKh6YyKGOgxquh4Gm1OjddDzKLozj/d8PR2AMcb/xHM1X NyP8lYGJT/k82EUIID4PIftVbrFaVOV/BMEO7llt/eAPgVSjH4uDYCGD0gER0tzrsUau hgH552m6pJk4Jel6OC2azXNrIjrNvheGEHsE6UGQtWxNELyS+xjx0vOgyebjo9v/v2dI 2J9A== X-Received: by 10.152.116.52 with SMTP id jt20mr14005093lab.52.1366653818207; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.3.165 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:03:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y5cahgbv.fsf@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: m3XH6gLK7yH4frkNJjoGXzWy6OE X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.217.179 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159128 Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Jambunathan K wrote: > There may be some requirements on concurrent Emacs side. I have never > seen a self-contained, well-defined work item myself. I don't know about the others but as far as I'm concerned, adding concurrency in GNU Emacs seems very complex and if so few people mentioned it in their ideas it's because it's daunting. As you said it's a very open-ended problem. I certainly don't feel experienced or knowledgeable enough to do it.