From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Aptel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 25 modules Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:33:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83oa27vnoj.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477488664 4997 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2016 13:31:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 15:30:29 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzOHL-0005lD-8Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:30:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34549 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzOHN-0007ZV-Mc for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzMSF-0002cQ-QJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzMSE-0006zC-BQ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]:35859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzMS9-0006va-5w; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y123so3088424vka.3; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:33:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=ndNwGCh4QqHPl8sjo7ljoT9h96ELn0oI8HJ5uwrC6E8=; b=Xivvif3cS+4umhTjC4E7zf+sHY5haNER2HXcWO+g5Wkzp/tpB5CxoaaaZsXqvYz/7d C+HiL4JLN8apphu2GAVZdvCTGlK/jOhkJt+sbsYxD3AaHZX75F6vaLYMzUlE/tQarJDG kiTGLUwQch/OppjAuA1QpqwTU9v7sygCE9+62PYufVGdJuQiS3axM6Z4kqI3TX018//k qDjKK+di8Skbwkqb3tCp0ppnS7/ehxwJ/Q+VeBflactJqACQbXVlNXTY356TEHyN0uKh /CJQnXVf7Qfe4+81Ztf/K/zphBxADP6UTgMupD8JeraEUxnJaVtUHGfyT1DyF5K9M5i5 /l7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ndNwGCh4QqHPl8sjo7ljoT9h96ELn0oI8HJ5uwrC6E8=; b=d6WDFPcFYCucko3Lo2THda2DUMMcrxScqsjIKB6fks7qET2V+LXIsMOQknFqXL5MEO z3yc/yimn2dwUUChIyV/iRXA9WacFBlOpEw94DcefA6W9IO1/GPgr0av3JNWnoXRRiW2 ArwM3vumQC0uXHaoi/P4tnySu/YzTHMiwqwL4HeaT0pzTjjHZgbq5IeD1qNlKwWT4bml U/hxG4YeA2pJJhWJSolkrpB2hlXw1TLwM6Dpy4aFAI1rDarMYVCO6tVAUDypSSlsi+MQ SH7dU9avvJ8m11UQW8gbdjpEoQZoYbl3bZHz8P6cb3ylm3hMYNrlemArSZY+TBtZkq+7 8+lA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdUQhOyOjt4no/EM6umazzn2dTp8XLFY4sXVhCg3fO/Fd7AE1uEMLaXAAxRJYgAyiDLSqYKZVsqC/eepg== X-Received: by 10.31.136.195 with SMTP id k186mr525622vkd.50.1477481584307; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.159.37.134 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:33:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83oa27vnoj.fsf@gnu.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cYOlVJ1w3-YcAbR-591zy71h868 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:26:14 -0400 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:111619 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Actually, my first suspect would be that your module doesn't protect > its data from GC. I would say it's unlikely after the GC switch to conservative scanning. Could you share your module code?