From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: uzibalqa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: [External] : Re: Add code from other files Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 22:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6d098cab-1a96-4eb7-a4c3-1a4cf0fb3270@starynkevitch.net> <2fa9f251-0c84-46b5-9a88-b525eb79a413@starynkevitch.net> <_PaeWZsPmOkMG6EHs5Q_pGgCKfPN6KS5G97LT-TdrvMPSwG-KP24LmGkPsei8HjCBOai36qQUA5h-XeSeyQ2OoB49djwEFS5RjWzONWiAG4=@proton.me> <87sewplyk9.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27405"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emanuel Berg , "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 05 00:08:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sPUcm-0006rD-8G for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:08:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPUc7-0004we-7X; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 18:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPUc5-0004wO-Nr for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 18:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-43167.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.167]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPUc2-0001ZD-IO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 18:07:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1720130852; x=1720390052; bh=CDvVW32g0WFWuOlngR4X1XJMoHWRK+oM1BbT4Af5UGU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=hj1CkiG+RP3nTC6DAvAgd/ID0qLofXbtN0G+j79Ea9BiXNmyO9ekUZXg8Cud7mmxQ 420bKIoLone940bUnj1RMTBHv6R6vtu0dLL5KLwyRXt+0IbSJHKJvnHLVYe92vKpsD xNK5qbm/VQwl10+8Uz1JwRbJuSRL6/Wyaa9nCub/cHQPPqo4SmgLDN1jPNbOAFO59/ SgGlPM6aaK2irm6DBDHv49pKUgB+dwdvVcdtp/EHoHIm6x60QChUi3vJZ/MLgu45+v +9MwTx2+dzc7tvQjZzFmOIBGrxP3t5CIXHSNIL7EYLjvJQqhUBhE05ijTPFFw2yfp1 8SrZ78y3giq8w== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 52887082:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 64d2a925b4778c9f489e0b018f68cf70d8fa24f8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.43.167; envelope-from=uzibalqa@proton.me; helo=mail-43167.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147076 Archived-At: On Thursday, July 4th, 2024 at 9:32 PM, Drew Adams = wrote: > > Use `provide' downmost in all your files, and whenever one function is = needed in some other file, you` require' that file > > first (topmost) in THAT file. > >=20 > > Is a good way to do it. > >=20 > > If you byte-compile it will tell you, if some file uses > > something not defined in that file, and also not require'd > > from another where it is. > >=20 > > So you can both find bugs that way and find out what needs to > > be required by what. >=20 >=20 > In addition, there's this case (not too common), > mentioned in (elisp) `Named Features': >=20 > Although top-level calls to 'require' are evaluated > during byte compilation, 'provide' calls are not. > Therefore, you can ensure that a file of definitions > is loaded before it is byte-compiled by including a > 'provide' followed by a 'require' for the same feature, > as in the following example. >=20 > (provide 'my-feature) ; Ignored by byte compiler, > ; evaluated by 'load'. > (require 'my-feature) ; Evaluated by byte compiler. Please do not complicate my life. Do I really need to use this not too=20 common case ?