From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Migrating to sourcehut - what's missing? Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:22:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871r26w27h.fsf@thornhill.no> <87lf0dq08j.fsf@thornhill.no> <87v8zh6azv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zgot648w.fsf@posteo.net> <878rwdpry1.fsf@thornhill.no> <87lf0dk52x.fsf@posteo.net> <8735mlpqes.fsf@thornhill.no> <87zgotoanj.fsf@thornhill.no> <87zgosg8de.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuez7lyg.fsf@gnus.org> <875yrfu2ge.fsf@thornhill.no> <83zgorvfzx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 10:23:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KKK-00038H-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:23:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50590 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KKJ-0001RO-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:23:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KJa-0000k4-KF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:23:10 -0500 Original-Received: from out0.migadu.com ([94.23.1.103]:46711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KJJ-0002s7-L5; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:23:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thornhill.no; s=key1; t=1640251371; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MKGgcjLMSU+mdFExVrEorsaC5hKTVI8JQwwWKet+1C8=; b=kwVERs1XQNSrdcjpK5+AxO4Jub05FjEJvMiPRclzgaFFQXBqMxZ/pESHUixbASG36VwTHf Su6FkeTpskbTdg+QSOarcr5JvLv6IC8nv03flVe9Xi91TTSYhOug8DLNuRl9UH+FS5YAQt 6HGgF9g5T5UD8YGPTGDxBYnsApL+krmR/rxhYYC48oGF65plw5S1+Idh4v1GZnrNMtXSVL 5ilfZY+f88dGrmnVobVz83EcNYjoRFCxCOp6a5WUdDt2F2F48+P08mnfDz8VHG3428k+PV 3B3zxCgPLafmBq7tIwvSTIsSk9mihst4GTHEthkCD5h4E4elPHIIDbGxQ4yyrA== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <83zgorvfzx.fsf@gnu.org> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: thornhill.no Received-SPF: pass client-ip=94.23.1.103; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out0.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282892 Archived-At: >>From my POV, the problem is not with how mailing lists are handled >there, the problem is with how email communications are handled when >those are involved in discussing patches and other issues=2E AFAIU, >this is what Lars was flagging, not the way mailing lists are hosted >there: we don't intend to move the Emacs mailing lists to sourcehut, >we just want to move the bug tracker and its related functionalities, >and that includes sending and receiving email=2E Yes, this would mean that emacs devs would have to adopt a markdown based = approach, which I assume also is unwanted=2E=20 I'm just glad this thread yielded some results, undecisive or not Theo