From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean-Christophe Helary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: evaluating numbers Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:36:32 +0900 Message-ID: References: <875zjw2emg.fsf@gmx.net> <618B38D9-CD34-4200-8CA1-1A6B0922A83A@traduction-libre.org> <871ruk2d3f.fsf@gmx.net> <3C929D7B-1C10-4713-9EDA-55C80FC36AD8@traduction-libre.org> <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="151305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: Emacs development discussions Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 01:36:49 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSsGe-000dFg-Vy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 01:36:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSsGd-0005sa-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSsGX-0005sS-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSsGW-0000dp-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:60845) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSsGW-0000Z6-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:36:40 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 182.251.131.42 Original-Received: from [172.20.10.2] (KD182251131042.au-net.ne.jp [182.251.131.42]) (Authenticated sender: jean.christophe.helary@traduction-libre.org) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF4B8C0003 for ; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 00:36:35 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <835zjvg385.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 217.70.183.198 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241963 Archived-At: > On Nov 7, 2019, at 23:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > we originally didn't limit > the values at all, and always displayed the corresponding character. > We changed that because people complained that sometimes evaluating an > integer expression takes a long time. What's the rationale behind limiting it to ascii and not to 0 displayed = characters ? That would make much more sense. Are there use cases where = displaying an ascii character when evaluating an integer is more = important than displaying an "=C3=A9" ? Jean-Christophe Helary ----------------------------------------------- http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune