Re: Gtk patch version 3, part 1

["Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

> "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se> writes:
>
>> If the second, can I refer to /usr/share/gtk-doc, where the GTK
>> documentation is usually installed?
>
> That isn't really a good idea.  That directory might be anywhere:
> /usr/share, /usr/local/share, /usr/pkg/share, etc, and it isn't
> necessarily in the same prefix as emacs (on my systems, it is in
> /usr/pkg but emacs is in /usr/local).  The URL you want to refer
> to is:
>
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-Resource-Files.html
>
> It's nigh-impossible for a naive user to navigate from
> http://www.gtk.org/ to that document.  Also, i think it satisfies
> Richard's suggestion (that the document may be included on a
> user's system).

Okay.

>
>> It is given by the GTK documentation, is it OK to just refer to that?
>
> I think it is better to list it here.

Won't that be a duplication of what is in that URL above?

>
>>>     + @example
>>>     + widget_class "GtkWindow.GtkVBox.GtkFixed.GtkVScrollbar" style 
>>> "my_sty
>> le"
>>>     + @end example
>
> [...]
>
>> It must be one line in the ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file, so I would like to avoid
>> changing it.
>
> No, it doesn't have to be on one line.  All whitespace is treated
> equally in gtkrc files.  I just tested this in my .gtkrc-2.0.

That is good to know!  I'll split the line then.

Thanks,
	Jan D.