From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: display-completion-list should not strip text properties Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:07:25 -0700 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189202871 32345 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 22:07:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:07:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 00:07:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITlzS-000629-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 00:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITlzQ-0002KB-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITlzN-0002JS-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITlzM-0002J8-3g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITlzL-0002J5-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITlzL-0007GA-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from agmgw1.us.oracle.com (agmgw1.us.oracle.com [152.68.180.212]) by rgminet01.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.4/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id l87M7eGP004097 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:07:41 -0600 Original-Received: from acsmt351.oracle.com (acsmt351.oracle.com [141.146.40.151]) by agmgw1.us.oracle.com (Switch-3.2.0/Switch-3.2.0) with ESMTP id l875wkq1012076 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:07:40 -0600 Original-Received: from dhcp-amer-csvpn-gw1-141-144-64-138.vpn.oracle.com by acsmt350.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3195161181189202838; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:07:18 -0700 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78204 Archived-At: > Why not? We're talking about the _possibility_ of adding a > graphic, not the obligation to do so. > > I have rejected this path for Emacs development. > The decision is made. > > Would people please stop arguing about it. For the record - That was written _before_ you "rejected this path". The only thing you had written previous to that was the following, which hardly closes the topic. On the contrary, it opens the door to discussion, asking if this is something we should do and if there are clean ways to "make it possible". > Is that really something we should get into? > I think we should not. > > That doesn't mean I am opposed to including some feature that would > make it possible. I would not be against that if it were clean, not a > lot of work, etc. But it is not a goal.