From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joshua Branson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#952: Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:04:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <004601c912ec$65610a10$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR10MB0594EF80AD3A7B3285086BFCA6F30BLUPR10MB0594namp_" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474040076 19506 195.159.176.226 (16 Sep 2016 15:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:34:36 +0000 (UTC) To: "952@debbugs.gnu.org" <952@debbugs.gnu.org> Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 17:34:28 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9e-0003Ny-0j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:34:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9b-0004oB-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9R-0004me-Ru for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9O-0005s7-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9O-0005s2-JJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv9O-0007Oy-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <004601c912ec$65610a10$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Resent-From: Joshua Branson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 952 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 952-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B952.147404001228408 (code B ref 952); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 952) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2016 15:33:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bkv8t-0007O7-CV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from blu004-omc3s29.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.104]:62162) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bksoh-0003gL-OI for 952@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 09:04:37 -0400 Original-Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.116.72]) by BLU004-OMC3S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:04:26 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3G3+vh/PNTk7TghDN0mcy/X7fRMn1pngoqNfpvTykbY=; b=Li4x4usTPJ+UssnQeI7b8DRefri6qX4AeCsRFCTcfXNPPrEncZivZptUl4UdoJ/KU/nDlY2fp9K8AdAJ5q5Rsf+MaF4gff459hzhCg6bdHBg7LELszEFs3b0wP7WMu53eyRKjtou5jgOyYya52XdbwZjGYCikeAArmVtlJB/R6Vaj6WQM8uIqSAbVrsTNqzktOuPG0ozK402UsIU960IRwJHqscYNJqkcIYbgT7b0a2D2PVgEOLhmrEqfXi8IWDdFJ0WIsWWcSVecWga6ze2Es7nIzPV2vTBKYBXR4NqVuJjS/Ynj+VKe0BYR+xT0NUuw66iv6Vqz43eFwFmc94aHA== Original-Received: from BN3NAM04FT046.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.55) by BN3NAM04HT102.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.93.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.619.6; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:04:25 +0000 Original-Received: from BLUPR10MB0594.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (10.152.92.52) by BN3NAM04FT046.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.93.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA_P384) id 15.1.619.6 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:04:25 +0000 Original-Received: from BLUPR10MB0594.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.124.145]) by BLUPR10MB0594.namprd10.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.124.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0609.018; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:04:25 +0000 Thread-Topic: bug#952 Thread-Index: AQHSEBiQ5ORUmVZM4Um1ziOqImS1SQ== Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 10.152.92.52) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; debbugs.gnu.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;debbugs.gnu.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com; received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 10.152.92.52 as permitted sender) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [qf+g6QWJ/afcYeU3cFBt+SMcJ/S07rYy] x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3NAM04HT102; 6:YSjkSnv3g9M+9gA0PlY086UKOUZrq7QSBHujVtT0abFwV9Q2gZcEtcG0ksUnvJYHK4CeqQVIGwVPTOgrI+A6iJ3TUN5xlvboUBRQJFeWZ1pVRnFM04FoPb7YQvVsHQkBSLz3B363unPNtH42a/Yp6c0OqMxYg3QtPxgvA1TxGcMuhQadlbxNqu/IaJj7upkYS38njWjTjYY3ohACkUkUN7cknsobO9FUEJ3S5GIqstvgNVt5jiCiAlXYOORmVklk3xmLk+uV6ue0A3LS0OUcF0psPvqxEvSvRqJv6HxZWYU=; 5:SF8y0Rv+kdFwTixYAr2lei+EqB7rhU/YSZiSIe/1Odj7A/sueszzclhgmcov25X2Wa4nIW7l8lJpiP1HpAhBkBcy3wo2Jcfce6lIXBtIPwAzIgF+TODWPV2fMKki2JSo2J17Zq2RAp6f+yiLzv1Szg==; 24:eF6i231MjpvyPK2/elYmhbZIRL5Syoxpr1xym5fUk/1VefdyL6VJMGT7w7pUI69Mg/zXclPv8DA76wnr58pP22OrTVDaweO/58s22VTs0jk=; 7:ROgE+1qSh6atMJP8qdlJIQpRU98v4OgjYMJ0zMWEsipz3bko9gspKdGjz3oLKKW2rFFal1VPyQrpyAvxwxyp4r62GsDHkRDaCEbS97L0A0HaIuq2l8D/PycrEd5b0YsPlk53S0kV3K7IchLtcvGG8eMNiVfcM5LFhqXamVK5X4EmcnkdfaLxzzq0zX2P32XDEPZrVcvD0yWzHPXEfP+8cBzN0YOEqkiNHbso7CyCiprlAph5ozR/Zir+YCMJb6N7UQDurPfmtzI9f x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3NAM04HT102; H:BLUPR10MB0594.namprd10.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b476212f-911a-4360-16bb-08d3de31fc08 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(1601124038)(1603103081)(1601125047); SRVR:BN3NAM04HT102; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:BN3NAM04HT102; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3NAM04HT102; x-forefront-prvs: 0067A8BA2A spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Sep 2016 13:04:25.0742 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM04HT102 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2016 13:04:26.0398 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA3FE3E0:01D2101A] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:33:29 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123385 Archived-At: --_000_BLUPR10MB0594EF80AD3A7B3285086BFCA6F30BLUPR10MB0594namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm using Parabola GNU/Linux. My emacs is version 24.5-4. Have you tried updating to a newer version of Emacs? The latest stable ver= sion of Emacs is 24 (Emacs 25 will soon be released soon). I'm not a devel= oper of Emacs, but if you are using an outdated version, the developers of = Emacs will probably prioritize fixing bugs on newer versions of Emacs. And don't -lC naturally conflict? Try running both ls -lC and ls -Cl in a = terminal. In my terminal, it does what the last flag says. So l -lC displ= ays the output in columns and l -Cl looks just like l -l. I've done (dired '("~/" ".bashrc" ".bash_profile" "-l") ;; shows the long format (dired '("~/" ".bashrc" ".bash_profile" "-lg") ;;shows the long format w= /o displaying the file owner. And it worked as expected. Can you give me a few more examples where dired is ignoring flags? --_000_BLUPR10MB0594EF80AD3A7B3285086BFCA6F30BLUPR10MB0594namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm using Parabola GNU/Linux.  My emacs is version 24.5-4.


Have you tried updating to a newer version of Emacs?  The latest st= able version of Emacs is 24 (Emacs 25 will soon be released soon).  I'= m not a developer of Emacs, but if you are using an outdated version, the d= evelopers of Emacs will probably prioritize fixing bugs on newer versions of Emacs.


And don't -lC naturally conflict?  Try running both ls -lC and ls -= Cl in a terminal.  In my terminal, it does what the last flag says.&nb= sp; So l -lC displays the output in columns and l -Cl looks just like l -l.=


I've done


(dired '("~/" ".bashrc"  ".bash_profile&qu= ot; "-l")  ;; shows the long format


(dired '("~/"  ".bashrc"  ".bash_prof= ile" "-lg")  ;;shows the long format w/o displaying the= file owner.


And it worked as expected.


Can you give me a few more examples where dired is ignoring flags?  = ;

--_000_BLUPR10MB0594EF80AD3A7B3285086BFCA6F30BLUPR10MB0594namp_--