From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toru TSUNEYOSHI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5251: 23.1; problem in decode_eol of coding.c Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 02:03:08 +0900 Message-ID: References: <8337srwcxm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455728668 16113 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2016 17:04:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ahyatt@gmail.com, 5251-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 17 18:04:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WS-00006j-60 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:04:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WR-0006T0-L6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WJ-0006SX-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WE-00080R-3B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WD-00080M-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5WD-0000q1-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Toru TSUNEYOSHI Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5251 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 5251-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D5251.14557286113174 (code D ref 5251); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5251-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2016 17:03:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5Vj-0000p8-6W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:03:31 -0500 Original-Received: from blu004-omc2s11.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.86]:54925) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aW5Vg-0000ou-U5 for 5251-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:03:29 -0500 Original-Received: from BLU436-SMTP86 ([65.55.111.71]) by BLU004-OMC2S11.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 09:03:23 -0800 X-TMN: [gCY/pPnGii8SitOG+B1JyV+Gb7cQB9W+] X-Originating-Email: [t_tuneyosi@hotmail.com] In-Reply-To: <8337srwcxm.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2016 17:03:22.0766 (UTC) FILETIME=[1BD10AE0:01D169A5] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113195 Archived-At: Oh, I have forgotten this issue completely. :-) From: Andrew Hyatt Subject: Re: bug#5251: 23.1; problem in decode_eol of coding.c Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:41:32 -0500 Message-ID: > BTW, this seems like a nice thing to unit test with ert, if a fix does > take place. What is the word "ert" ? Would you like to tell me the meaning ? From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#5251: 23.1; problem in decode_eol of coding.c Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:53:41 +0200 Message-ID: <8337srwcxm.fsf@gnu.org> > Thanks for the reminder, I fixed this now on the emacs-25 branch. > (The proposed patch was not entirely correct, although it was in the > right direction, and happened to fix this particular case.) After I checked my patch again, I thoght my patch was not enough maybe. > better late than never. Yes, that's right. Thanks, Mr. Andrew Hyatt and Mr. Eli Zaretskii.