From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Berndl, Klaus" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: ECB Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 18:57:01 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089219455 27321 80.91.224.253 (7 Jul 2004 16:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "'emacs-devel@gnu.org'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 07 18:57:22 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiFjV-0002ei-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:57:21 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiFjU-00054U-00 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:57:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BiFlZ-0000Yi-NL for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:59:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BiFlR-0000VY-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BiFlP-0000Sr-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BiFlP-0000SV-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:59:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.76.162.229] (helo=world1.sdm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BiFjJ-0002Jj-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 12:57:09 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=world1.sdm.de) by world1.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp id 1BiFjI-0007Ca-Hp; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:57:08 +0200 Original-Received: from mucns1.muc.sdm.de ([193.102.180.22]) by world1.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp id 1BiFjE-0007CL-0f; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:57:04 +0200 Original-Received: by mucns1.muc.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sdmexch1.muc.sdm.de) id 1BiFjD-0007hB-VA; Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:57:04 +0200 Original-Received: by sdmexch1.muc.sdm.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 18:57:03 +0200 Original-To: "'jmarant@free.fr'" X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25530 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25530 Berndl, Klaus wrote: >>> The biggest difference between ECB and speedbar is that speedbar >>> always appears in a seperate frame (it can be forced into another >>> frame, but it is not easy), whereas ECB has several layout options, >>> AFAIK all of which use windows within the current frame. Many people >>> are used to working in other programs within the same frame, so they >>> may see this as an improvement over speedbar. > >> IIRC, ECB uses tree-widget, which has recently been added to the >> Emacs trunk. I think this is what you compare with speedbar. > > No, ECB doesn't use the tree-widget lib it uses its own tree-library! > > Klaus > > Klaus Berndl mailto: klaus.berndl@sdm.de > sd&m AG http://www.sdm.de > software design & management > Carl-Wery-Str. 42, 81739 Muenchen, Germany > Tel +49 89 63812-392, Fax -220