From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: POLL: Change of keys to move agenda through time Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:48:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87skfgxn0f.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdkduo9s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfuVk-0000NR-IL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:48:25 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfuVf-0000Lk-Gc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:48:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfuVe-0000LX-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:48:18 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:41029) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfuVe-0000lG-4w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:48:18 -0400 Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so3198621ewy.31 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:48:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ocq4xgxd.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Benjamin Andresen Cc: org-mode Mailinglist Hi everyone, I tend to agree with the arguments that "n" and "p" should move vertically in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do it like this. So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should move the agenda forward and backward in time. - Carsten On Aug 25, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Benjamin Andresen wrote: > Hey Bastien, > > Bastien writes: > >> Benjamin Andresen writes: >>> But "n" and "p" are already used to move up and down entries in the >>> org-agenda. >>> Where would they go to then? >> >> C-n and C-p, like in any Emacs buffer? > > Sure. That's a given. But they seem to be the fallback, IMO. > > As Leo wrote: ibuffer, gnus, dired & others all use 'n' for next > line and 'p' for previous line. > > And with the recent mark and unmark feature inspired by dired, doing > what it does, seems intuitive as far as emacs goes. > > Another example I can think of: > epa-list-keys uses 'n' and 'p' and 'm' and 'u' for the same things > as dired and ibuffer. > > Basically it's the Principle Of Least Surprise. "n", "p" doing what it > does now falls under it for me, based on all the other software I use. > > br, > benny > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode