[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I wonder why (bind*) evaluates only its first value to determine
if the binding condition is true? We already have macros which
evaluate the "truth of a set of bindings": the members of the
if-let family. And they
"Evaluate each binding in turn, as in ‘let*’, stopping if a
binding value is nil. If all are non-nil return the [final]
value."
That does not seem natural to me at all. I don't see that it is
better.