From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Desired behavior on splitting screens in xwidget Webkit Browser Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2019 02:30:15 +0900 Message-ID: References: <7534417B-6B8D-494C-AC0C-D361C6B3F5C0@icloud.com> <2F4F5EF6-5695-439B-96E4-09C61C314281@icloud.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="99211"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Emacs developers To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 19 19:30:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hoWiK-000Pcn-4O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 19:30:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47308 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoWiI-0006n3-GY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:30:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hoWiA-0006mr-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoWi9-0001yF-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from st43p00im-ztdg10073201.me.com ([17.58.63.177]:34703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hoWi8-0001t8-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:30:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1563557419; bh=bVyK93lQWbN+cnpJdx7O5Ni4UMrgj2bmMz34GeyMMpI=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=oXCshqwrEOA3UCgJAau7PmOmkWrXj1D7awqg3/MqfXFA/ShpaOooKmMfqd4w5d6n6 SLNEYklmZQ6Ys1gt/zRy+OAG6W2TVK2xNXfw1/ywaOawY+/J/10QW3bsaWNpl6p6YX Fu66CN5+tPb687u1a5pPaRzwD5fnC3Q38AViBzClQlde29F31Nx6Od2FubkM1KFw84 ohByUdjWYv2KZQGQU+UwF9OwyYd9e0dCRHKd/n6mRuYvc9IUewUn5s3DWERkCiDCGt mNhQpVAQurwJdo/6vnAZ62Tyte4Fxt8YT74le1VirCFmSFGgvwNVvu5dlAbQ2zyJLg 78MpoGFod8jRA== Original-Received: from [192.168.0.11] (unknown [1.230.108.64]) by st43p00im-ztdg10073201.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFB4F720B58; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:30:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-19_11:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=816 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1812120000 definitions=main-1907190187 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 17.58.63.177 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238711 Archived-At: > 2019. 7. 20. =EC=98=A4=EC=A0=84 1:16, Stefan Monnier = =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: >=20 >>>> Currently, displaying one xwidgets in two different buffers is >>>> not supported. >>> But the user can still cause it to happen. What happens in this = case? >> The xwidget buffer shows nothing, with an error message =E2=80=98Viewin= g two xwidget >> buffers simultaneously is not supported.' >=20 > Does it show this error message on both (i.e. all) windows where the > buffer is displayed? If so, then I think it would be worthwhile to = try > and improve the code so one of the windows gets to be functional = (while > the others display the error message). No, the original one keeps functional. (The others display the error = message as you said.) > Stefan >=20 >=20