From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9532: 24.0.50; `special-display-regexps' is no longer respected Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:24:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <9202F08DB196437E8AD75A3C535E5A7D@us.oracle.com><87y5xlg9xq.fsf@stupidchicken.com><1D79C6CD14EE4C76B74C446E04B9CA65@us.oracle.com><85680E6E160C472FBC47C2FDA86BA171@us.oracle.com><874o05x4l6.fsf@stupidchicken.com><208166A8F7EF4681B76EADADCA39822C@us.oracle.com><877h51n82z.fsf@stupidchicken.com><8AAF50092BB64E5F8A2E82AF50CC04DB@us.oracle.com><23EB914729DE4B62AF7CBB9AB099B0F8@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320074759 32354 80.91.229.12 (31 Oct 2011 15:25:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9532@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Chong Yidong'" , "'martin rudalics'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 31 16:25:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtkH-0006nj-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:25:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46164 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtkH-00079F-DS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtkF-00078t-Hl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtkE-0000aT-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtkE-0000aI-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:25:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtmM-0006nU-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9532 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9532-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9532.132007482426057 (code B ref 9532); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9532) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2011 15:27:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtlQ-0006mD-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RKtlN-0006lj-Gv for 9532@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p9VFOk7v023211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:24:47 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9VFOkZK022943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:24:46 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt101.oracle.com (abhmt101.oracle.com [141.146.116.53]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p9VFOefQ030673; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:24:40 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acx4gBWSWKUa82CpT8ibu7kO9IBBwQAADqpgAiyZnWADVwWWQAJUTSCQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4EAEBDC0.0174,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53348 Archived-At: > Good news, for me at least: This bug seems to be fixed in > Emacs 24 pretest #1 Alas, no; I was mistaken. The bug is still there, in both the first and second deliveries of pretest #1. I have non-nil pop-up-frames. I have special-display-regexps set to: ("[ ]?[*][^*]+[*]"). And yet, when I do M-x report-emacs-bug, instead of buffer *unsent mail to bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org* being popped up in its own, special-display frame, that buffer _replaces_ the current buffer in the same (non-special-display) frame. IOW, `special-display-regexps' is still being ignored. The reason I mistakenly thought that the bug had been fixed is that I do _not_ see the problem for *info* buffers: they are correctly opened in special-display frames. I don't know why there is this difference, since both buffers match `special-display-regexps'. Note that both `same-window-buffer-names' and `same-window-regexps' are nil. This bug has been dragging on for a very long time now. It was fixed temporarily with Martin's code, but things were broken again when his code was dropped. Please, pretty please fix this bug as a priority, before the next pretest. Thx.