From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8543: 23.3; glib include path mangled Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:55:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874o5n7542.fsf@sc3d.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303755262 20883 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 18:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8543@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 20:14:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQIa-0001N2-UO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54488 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQIZ-00060g-S7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQIW-00060L-QY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQIV-0004FT-Qj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQIV-0004FP-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ0x-0005QP-43; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reuben Thomas Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:56:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8543 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8543-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8543.130375412020796 (code B ref 8543); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:56:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8543) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Apr 2011 17:55:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ0G-0005PM-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:55:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ0D-0005PB-NQ for 8543@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:55:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTbW1f2bMhzFr4SaaDxD1msgtqjnqJY/n@postini.com; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:55:17 PDT Original-Received: by gyf1 with SMTP id 1so778591gyf.6 for <8543@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.236.192.197 with SMTP id i45mr4427512yhn.63.1303754111013; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.236.108.173 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46000 Archived-At: On 25 April 2011 17:21, Glenn Morris wrote: > Reuben Thomas wrote: > >> Since the workaround is trivial, can we expect a fix for the emacs-23 branch? > > If/when it is confirmed that there will be a 23.4 release, sure. I meant in bzr. Seems a bit odd not to commit a fix just because it's unclear if/when there will be a 23.4 release...after all there have been other minor fixes since release. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org