From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8492: 23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion? Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:53:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zknuhxl4.fsf@sc3d.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302908854 31930 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2011 23:07:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8492@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 01:07:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAs6q-0002zd-Vk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 01:07:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33292 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAs6q-0006H4-DI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAs6n-0006Gn-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAs6m-0007YM-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAs6l-0007YI-U1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QArtq-0004bo-Dz; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reuben Thomas Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8492 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8492-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8492.130290800917677 (code B ref 8492); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8492) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2011 22:53:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QArtI-0004b4-5u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exprod7og126.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.206]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QArtF-0004aq-HZ for 8492@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:53:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-px0-f176.google.com ([209.85.212.176]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob126.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTajMXhhOjeoBkQCO3+JSz9F85sNPMzAE@postini.com; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:53:25 PDT Original-Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so1338291pxi.35 for <8492@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.7.74 with SMTP id h10mr2652822pba.350.1302907998364; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.68.60.4 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:53:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:54:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45830 Archived-At: On 15 April 2011 20:53, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Is it therefore time to admit defeat and find an alternative binding for >> completion functions, even if it=92s an extra binding rather than simply= a >> different one? > > TAB can do completion if you (setq tab-always-indent 'complete). Thanks for the tip, I'll try that. --=20 http://rrt.sc3d.org