From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 21:22:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87wrjquacf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj05svwh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp11imgb.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <8739mc5nes.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipuubao6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwpjfkkz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp072fb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5vimm5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zknjmcyk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjta2zvp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyzglkh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <4DB77682.1070605@gmail.com> <8762q04ba1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb9dufao.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83liyn4tps.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304450607 8117 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2011 19:23:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 19:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 21:23:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLBr-0000C0-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 21:23:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLBq-0001Jw-Nr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:23:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLBn-0001Jr-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLBm-0001qn-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:33314) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHLBl-0001qL-Qv; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: by yib18 with SMTP id 18so192035yib.0 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FSzIJ/JbaSGrs1wnqXcIfezoGSdYc4eh+azJtXUZJ30=; b=sMaHI4daMhxbk0ILUPVWMZiA6dbOCqbKsKkb2QX+FA1MDDR7hd1wvTMbTayYLwcgpT ktw8pdmCR0+VI0xjcinjB6U8XvM7+dx1TqoixbzX7gepQ0aA2iPV6klIbb26cbCusZRU ct437mkhPyIucruuTslrYOw5hsK3w0U9QW478= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oFoIM7Qc08aAlpk3Zf4ZSwgjSeyhYws/GMd/2yHa9qs0tVMxiL7Q/v4U94v2taVUpH iu9Pggon2xeY78s2F5X5XAUWnMxETJd6C8pdnG7Mh/xQCF05s1qPVbSgnUrlPIbkGi+B uoiMD6OMUl9STg9fjx0Mjep9coOeBibw+TstQ= Original-Received: by 10.236.182.162 with SMTP id o22mr178195yhm.495.1304450597286; Tue, 03 May 2011 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.147.182.5 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2011 12:22:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83liyn4tps.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.218.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139067 Archived-At: On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 18:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > ?? But we have gobs of other headers that use Lisp_Object, and none of > them includes lisp.h. We simply should be careful to include lisp.h > before everything else, including w32.h. =C2=A0Doesn't that work for you? Yes, of course. > I thought it was good to clean it up a bit while you are > at that. =C2=A0But if you want to leave fixing this to another rainy day,= I > will understand. No, I'll revise these issues and send a new patch; hopefully tonight. Thanks, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma