From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [h-e-w] emacs-20110510 windows binaries Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 21:29:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87tyd2zasn.fsf@gmail.com> <874o505awb.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxis3rvc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyb3l6r.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877h9vzqws.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305228597 4109 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2011 19:29:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 21:29:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKba5-0001rp-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 21:29:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60113 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKba4-0007Gu-I0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKba1-0007Gf-6U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKba0-0002Re-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:38027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKbZz-0002Ra-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:29:47 -0400 Original-Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so817687gyd.0 for ; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JZJUxUIua9vIzxw/duPc6/w2hKREegu8ayXeJHv4fC0=; b=CnWX4EtMEmKHOpy8ZNv/+ojP2hlaNQR0HMZM9hvLDhNqSD2cLwba3Z8ovHkObDSWSU yvdoNNAESH+BNtnF/MZ0s826FrfBinN38EK9x4L+3NqGFABMT1sE8xR/uHyjrP8hn+PK aEpm59dCBWgAZLhZ4i/l/621xwtq7G+rhQUw8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Nmn/WW2FqDjaIBPmnz1GD1yJUrs1tP+1SN0/fOI6ZuMr6E8+7Jy7T74JGwWjbkcvqo CSpAsioFnR1PrQcOQM+oRIWLhiMzvwmAIEMxQoUlfwEP8dmjdlkC5zaZjgWMPBc1WQUh QsqmxOlL8fimxgosOjrX143Q7nTFPPLV40tqQ= Original-Received: by 10.146.130.8 with SMTP id c8mr507625yad.31.1305228587169; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.147.167.11 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:29:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877h9vzqws.fsf@lifelogs.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.160.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139334 Archived-At: 2011/5/12 Ted Zlatanov : > I'm not sure which maintainers you mean. =C2=A0The Emacs maintainers? =C2= =A0Do > they care? =C2=A0The distribution maintainer (Sean in this case) seems li= ke > the more important decision maker. Well, I don't think so. > It doesn't have to be distributed with the binaries IIUC, but a link to > the source code should be provided. IANAL, but I think you must provide access to the code that compiles to the same binary you're distributing (so it's not just pointing to the repository; at the very least it's the release tag or equivalent), and you must still do so even if the third party hosting the code suddenly decides to take its copy of the source code off-line. But as I've said, IANAL and I'm out of my deep here. Let's hear from the people who takes the decisions and speaks the legalese. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma