From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: oslsachem Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8562: Emacs 23.1 and later don't work in windows 98 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 00:32:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83d3k88k6o.fsf@gnu.org> <83wri4kpwb.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3j9e2pn.fsf@gnu.org> <8339k3esws.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrhed91s.fsf@gnu.org> <838vtscbeu.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwvc1eq.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcwsf2ra.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4d6fuph.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqmve2s2.fsf@gnu.org> <837h92dqai.fsf@gnu.org> <83r579c6wn.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307313205 16054 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2011 22:33:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 22:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 00:33:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsn-0000ZY-30 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:33:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsl-000488-KH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsV-00047y-SD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsU-0007K0-Rs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsU-0007Jw-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLsT-0001OD-V0; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: oslsachem Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 8562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8562.13073131445299 (code B ref 8562); Sun, 05 Jun 2011 22:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2011 22:32:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLrs-0001NQ-IO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com ([209.85.161.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTLrq-0001NE-55 for 8562@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so2123211fxm.3 for <8562@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uNIpaX8XIoGa0gRQ6H3uXk8ZMgggI/318CiU+dJGPnY=; b=QPSXnTFMB2hjqIB/ICToYYFhd/Ncfda7Jq//C7IvEEGadg/xjXeEupfPSQIZ9R7X8V hLkvVJySFeW1qUePnOrP8I6FXsEFM3f0f1b8WLqKjRHXaksDJckya8RBTZDESrxtuVHK hOkupuL7TMNrTafAfjJKeR1tDGl7l1jTsj1bw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GBtBNGo+7X09099iaVNfQDSYKIv7wMXinxYUqK44PK0Knz6ArSULXndGJ+b0q2Yzqf 3d5sx093Tk5JPD9k4RBhZpdd+whJ9WO+y+Ej8va8s2Tr1CyUgQNXTpjR9+2hVUirBkc/ elc6oFyxWRS5UONHHL6MVPVVp/Rn/ghfi9EfU= Original-Received: by 10.223.159.14 with SMTP id h14mr2406075fax.20.1307313136355; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.223.86.1 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 15:32:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r579c6wn.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:33:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46981 Archived-At: >> I have only observed that: >> - Emacs chooses the ansi versions of the functions LookupAccountSid >> and GetFileSecurity. > > That's OK, and has no relation to the problem at hand. =A0First, file > security is not available on filesystems supported by Windows 9X. =A0And > second, even if they were, Emacs currently uses only the ANSI versions > of those functions anyway. I'm sorry for bringing up this issue. I should have realized of that myself: these functions are not in the list of unicode functions called by Emacs which are implemented in unicows.dll, which I previously posted in this thread. > So if you call GetGlyphOutlineW through a function pointer, like you > did with the other 2 functions, and do NOT link against libunicows, do > you then get a working binary? =A0It would be good to run such a binary > for a while, and see if something else is broken, if you can afford > that. Of course, I will check it. > Anyway, thanks for your great help. =A0I think we will have a solution > very soon. Thanks to you for your instructions. Greetings, Osl