From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Deniz Dogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8492: 23.3; Time to use a different binding for completion? Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:02:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4DAF0CC5.5060005@harpegolden.net> <87zknuhxl4.fsf@sc3d.org> <874o5smpfz.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303366061 30743 80.91.229.12 (21 Apr 2011 06:07:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Sean Sieger Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 21 08:07:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCn3B-00040p-7n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:07:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57394 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCn3A-0006Cx-NE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCn34-000631-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:07:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCn33-0008RA-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCn33-0008R6-ET for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:07:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyk-0007Zk-4m; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Deniz Dogan Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8492 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.130336577629109 (code B ref -1); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2011 06:02:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyd-0007ZR-Os for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyb-0007ZF-SX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyV-0007cF-T0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:48 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:56253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyV-0007cB-Rf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyV-0005k0-23 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyT-0007b5-Pj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-vx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:33950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QCmyT-0007b1-M2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: by vxk20 with SMTP id 20so1399246vxk.0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b8FvSHQktCFPz3xhad9ukwcBRq6ldftzZdHSv9F1uF0=; b=sQ0GVGepX9zxAfJzBb0bo/O7Ucwyi7aaf1EoI0m9fd9SUh3OxwM7mdpF8GQs9l4umQ rhK44VopmSjGKMVsfrrHCrusELz9cjkSuLrEZs30HIeoyonNKd4JmweCnee8RVcT+mdp x/3S8fZtBM1RSKNcF+VH9ZtAEyH02KQw9cqu4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=LKresNWNkH1a1/2q/ZwjNfCt0jfK8sEyaKIS3IZjqQva2ND6f8IOoVwT29AYf+/eeI gOGyaKMgMcrz6VaRUu9PKL+mPF6ihTDbnNDmcWqx5ZFHf6qTO5Z2G7VcAlaNEGP8o3xF FuHPt5OajpwmDw9DAqFWxXLtPIT896+DIajTQ= Original-Received: by 10.52.177.196 with SMTP id cs4mr11655522vdc.279.1303365763946; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.52.159.226 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:02:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874o5smpfz.fsf@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:03:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45908 Archived-At: 2011/4/21 Sean Sieger : > Windows Vista and Windows 7 use Win+TAB to switch between windows in > a more useless and annoying manner. Sort of like a rolodex: > http://thavarajah.dk/sites/thavarajah.dk/uploads/2007/01/vista_window_switch.png > > Yep. > > But you know, when I first encountered Windows 7, I got the distinct > impression (with precisely phenomena like the `rolodex' you refer to, > what, with Alt-TAB doing the slide across the app images and the > redundancy) that Microsoft was trying to keep up with the slickitiness > of Ubuntu. Ubuntu's just as ugly and heavy. > I wasn't hating on Windows for the rolodex thing, I'm just saying it's useless. That said, I'm not sure what window manager you're referring to when you say Ubuntu.