From: Peter Frings <peter.frings@agfa.com>
To: org-mode Mailinglist <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:26:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B3EB5713-BAF2-4F79-934F-73E7AFAD9723@agfa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC472F7.4020208@online.de>
On 01 Oct 2009, at 11:14, Rainer Stengele wrote:
> Jean-Marie Gaillourdet schrieb:
>> Hi,
>> while we are discussing a new org-remember facility. I've been
>> missing
>> an option to clock the time I've taken to write down my remember
>> note.
>> E.g. I use remember to make a small protocoll of a telephone call or
>> some discussion with a colleague. It would help me alot to if that
>> time would be clocked automatically. After the remember note is
>> finalized the previous cloked in task
>> should become active again. Perhaps with some kind of optional
>> message/popup/whatever to say: Well, you were doing this before, I
>> clocked you in again.
>
[snip]
> exactly what I am doing quite often!
> Being interrupted (telephone, colleague bringing more work ...)
> while working on an clocked in TODO I pop up a remember buffer,
> manually clock in, discuss/write down my stuff, save the remember
> buffer and then have to find the old task.
> Yes, "C-u C-c C-x C-j" shows you the recent clcoked in tasks but
> automising the clocking in/out work would make the "remembering" of
> new tasks just faster.
I could image a `clock out and return to the previous one' would be
handy, even out of the remember facility. Nested activities would be
great! Of course, one could always mis-use remember for that (if the
previous feature get implemented, that is), but it feels more
convenient to have nested clocks.
Cheers,
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-29 20:48 A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?) Samuel Wales
2009-09-30 10:39 ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
2009-09-30 10:40 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-09-30 14:45 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2009-09-30 14:50 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-09-30 15:55 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2009-10-01 3:25 ` Sebastian Rose
2009-10-05 23:41 ` A simpler remember architecture Daniel Clemente
2009-10-06 0:24 ` Alan E. Davis
2009-10-01 8:03 ` A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?) Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
2009-10-01 9:14 ` Rainer Stengele
2009-10-01 10:26 ` Peter Frings [this message]
2009-10-01 18:41 ` A simpler remember architecture Bernt Hansen
2009-10-02 8:08 ` Jean-Marie Gaillourdet
2009-10-02 13:54 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-10-03 2:48 ` David Bremner
2009-10-06 6:49 ` Daniel Clemente
2009-10-06 11:32 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-10-06 12:27 ` Carsten Dominik
2009-10-06 14:33 ` Daniel Clemente
2009-10-06 14:34 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-10-07 7:17 ` Eric S Fraga, Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B3EB5713-BAF2-4F79-934F-73E7AFAD9723@agfa.com \
--to=peter.frings@agfa.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.