* Problem with recurring timestamps @ 2009-07-06 9:11 Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 9:45 ` Tassilo Horn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw To: emacs-orgmode Hi all, I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * TODO test3 DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally mark it as done. Org-version reports "6.21b". Cheers, Martin Pohlack ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 9:11 Problem with recurring timestamps Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 9:45 ` Tassilo Horn 2009-07-06 9:53 ` Martin Pohlack 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tassilo Horn @ 2009-07-06 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw To: emacs-orgmode Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: Hi Martin, > I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > * TODO test3 > DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and > the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally > mark it as done. > > Org-version reports "6.21b". I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. Bye, Tassilo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 9:45 ` Tassilo Horn @ 2009-07-06 9:53 ` Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 10:02 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Tassilo Horn wrote: > Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: > > Hi Martin, > >> I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * TODO test3 >> DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and >> the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally >> mark it as done. >> >> Org-version reports "6.21b". > > I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it > works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing > the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. Given that timestamps can have an hour and minute component, the h syntax seems logical, right? Cheers, Martin Pohlack ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 9:53 ` Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 10:02 ` Carsten Dominik 2009-07-06 10:19 ` Martin Pohlack 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-07-06 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw To: Martin Pohlack; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: > Tassilo Horn wrote: >> Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: >> >> Hi Martin, >> >>> I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> * TODO test3 >>> DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and >>> the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally >>> mark it as done. >>> >>> Org-version reports "6.21b". >> >> I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning >> period, it >> works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, >> changing >> the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. > > The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use this? - Carsten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 10:02 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2009-07-06 10:19 ` Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 10:32 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode Carsten Dominik wrote: > On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: > >> Tassilo Horn wrote: >>> Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: >>> >>> Hi Martin, >>> >>>> I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> * TODO test3 >>>> DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and >>>> the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally >>>> mark it as done. >>>> >>>> Org-version reports "6.21b". >>> I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning >>> period, it >>> works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, >>> changing >>> the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. >> The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. > > yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. > Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use this? I have a weekly recurring event which is due Friday 17:00, but I can only start working on it shortly before, say 2 h. I would like it not to appear in the agenda until 15:00 at Friday, or it could appear at Friday's agenda, with an extended timestamp (15:00), so I know it has to be done later. I could also be handled like this item: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * TODO test4 DEADLINE: <2009-07-06 Mo 14:00> SCHEDULED: <2009-07-06 Mo 13:00> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In the agenda: Monday 6 July 2009 W28 8:00...... ---------------- 10:00...... ---------------- 12:00...... ---------------- file.org:13:00...... Scheduled: TODO test4 file.org:14:00...... Deadline: TODO test4 14:00...... ---------------- 16:00...... ---------------- 18:00...... ---------------- 20:00...... ---------------- Cheers, Martin Pohlack ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 10:19 ` Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 10:32 ` Carsten Dominik 2009-07-06 12:00 ` Martin Pohlack 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-07-06 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw To: Martin Pohlack; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Martin Pohlack wrote: > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: >> >>> Tassilo Horn wrote: >>>> Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes: >>>> >>>> Hi Martin, >>>> >>>>> I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> * TODO test3 >>>>> DEADLINE: <2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) >>>>> and >>>>> the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will >>>>> finally >>>>> mark it as done. >>>>> >>>>> Org-version reports "6.21b". >>>> I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning >>>> period, it >>>> works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, >>>> changing >>>> the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. >>> The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. >> >> yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. >> Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use >> this? > > I have a weekly recurring event which is due Friday 17:00, but I can > only start working on it shortly before, say 2 h. > > I would like it not to appear in the agenda until 15:00 at Friday, > or it > could appear at Friday's agenda, with an extended timestamp (15:00), > so > I know it has to be done later. > > I could also be handled like this item: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > * TODO test4 > DEADLINE: <2009-07-06 Mo 14:00> SCHEDULED: <2009-07-06 Mo 13:00> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This looks like a very good way to handle this use case. The daily agenda is really about "what is up today", and it should tell you in the morning what stuff is waiting for you instead of giving you nasty surprises at 3 in the afternoon. You can add a repeater to both the deadline and the scheduled item, they will both be kicked forward when you mark the entry done. HTH - Carsten > > In the agenda: > > Monday 6 July 2009 W28 > 8:00...... ---------------- > 10:00...... ---------------- > 12:00...... ---------------- > file.org:13:00...... Scheduled: TODO test4 > file.org:14:00...... Deadline: TODO test4 > 14:00...... ---------------- > 16:00...... ---------------- > 18:00...... ---------------- > 20:00...... ---------------- > > Cheers, > Martin Pohlack ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Problem with recurring timestamps 2009-07-06 10:32 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2009-07-06 12:00 ` Martin Pohlack 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Martin Pohlack @ 2009-07-06 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: Tassilo Horn, emacs-orgmode Carsten Dominik wrote: [...] >> I could also be handled like this item: >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> * TODO test4 >> DEADLINE: <2009-07-06 Mo 14:00> SCHEDULED: <2009-07-06 Mo 13:00> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This looks like a very good way to handle this use case. > > The daily agenda is really about "what is up today", and it > should tell you in the morning what stuff is waiting for you > instead of giving you nasty surprises at 3 in the afternoon. > > You can add a repeater to both the deadline and the > scheduled item, they will both be kicked forward when > you mark the entry done. Ahh, this solves my problem, thanks. I didn't know they were completed in one step. Cheers, Martin Pohlack PS.: There is only this little "symmetry itching" thing left ;-). ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-06 12:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-07-06 9:11 Problem with recurring timestamps Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 9:45 ` Tassilo Horn 2009-07-06 9:53 ` Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 10:02 ` Carsten Dominik 2009-07-06 10:19 ` Martin Pohlack 2009-07-06 10:32 ` Carsten Dominik 2009-07-06 12:00 ` Martin Pohlack
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.